Share

Government departments are 'cooling' on payment-by-results, conference participants suggest

Government departments are 'cooling' on payment-by-results, conference participants suggest
News

Government departments are 'cooling' on payment-by-results, conference participants suggest

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 6 Mar 2013

Whitehall is becoming less enthusiastic about payment-by-results, suggests Adrian Brown, an associate at charity think tank Institute of Government.

Brown, who is also a principal at Boston Consulting Group, airs his views in a blog on the Institute of Government’s website. He says senior Whitehall officials sounded “distinctly cool” about payment-by-results at the National Audit Office’s annual conference last month.

The conference, on performance measurement, heard from representatives from the Cabinet Office and Treasury.

According to publicservice.co.uk, Katharine Davidson, executive director for strategy at the Cabinet Office’s Efficiency and Reform Group (ERG), told delegates that her department was taking a more “measured view” of payment-by-results.

“We were very bullish on payment-by-results contracts at the start, the more we know about the quality of the input information and the inability to link it to outcomes, we in the ERG have taken a more measured view of them.”

Publicservice.co.uk also quotes a senior Treasury official expressing doubts about payment-by-results. Sharon White, the director general for public services at the Treasury, said: "We take a pragmatic view of whether payment-by-results works. It is quite hard to get a firm handle on the numbers.

"We have now got a situation at the Ministry of Justice where Chris Grayling… is going to take a payment-by-results approach to almost the whole of probation. But some of us who have been around a long time get very nervous about panaceas."

She added: "We're taking a very cautious approach on whether this is going to deliver better value for money compared to direct public spending intervention."

Payment-by-results oversold

Brown, in his blog, says the move in Whitehall is a good thing: “The truth is that payment-by-results was vastly oversold in the first place. Variously it has been claimed that payment-by-results can help to reduce public expenditure, improve efficiency, transfer risk to the private sector, encourage a more joined-up approach, and drive innovation. There is little or no evidence of any of this (yet) although I’m more willing to believe the latter items in that list.”

Brown continues that if payment-by-results schemes are to overcome the growing scepticism, they will need to prove their worth. He says outcome metrics must be measurable and attributable with a baseline that reflects the expected performance without payment-by-results.

He adds that providers must be fairly rewarded for the risks they are taking within payment-by-results contracts and that risk and reward should be fairly apportioned along the supply chain.

“Large contractors shouldn’t simply pass risk through to small, voluntary sector providers less well able to hold it," he says. “Equally, voluntary sector providers must be savvy about the subcontracts they sign.”

Voluntary sector groups have long voiced concerns that payment-by-results government schemes, such as the Work Programme, are stifling the charity sector with risk and additional burdens such as cash flow problems.

Last year, 25-year-old charity, Red Kite Learning closed. At the time it said government payment-by-results programmes such as the Work Programme had made its future untenable.

The latest payment-by-results initiative to be announced by government are plans to to contract out probation services for low and medium-risk offenders to the private and voluntary sector.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Islamic Relief Worldwide income falls by £18m

20 Oct 2014

Islamic Relief Worldwide has seen its income drop from £100m in 2012 to £82m in 2013, according to...

Charity criticised after refusing to pay Ashya King’s parents' legal fees

17 Oct 2014

Kids 'n' Cancer UK has been criticised for saying it will not pay the legal fees of the family of Ashya...

Voluntary sector sees “revolving door” of staff, says report

20 Oct 2014

The voluntary sector is experiencing a “revolving door” of staff with employee turnover levels at...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Paul Farmer appointed chair of Acevo

17 Oct 2014

Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind, has been appointed the chair of the Association of Chief Executives...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance