Share

Volunteering England warns against 'job substitution'

Justin Davis Smith, chief executive, Volunteering England
News

Volunteering England warns against 'job substitution'

Governance | Kirsty Weakley | 19 Apr 2012

Volunteering England has warned organisations against job substitution, stating that it risks damaging the reputation of volunteering.

The organisation has today published A guide to avoiding job substitution in partnership with Locality, Navca and NCVO to explain how charities should manage situations so that volunteers do not, or are not perceived to, take on roles that were previously done by paid members of staff.

Job substitution is when volunteers replace paid members of staff. Volunteering England says that in extreme cases this occurs when jobs are cut and volunteers are recruited to fill gaps. At the other end of the spectrum it can occur when a charity withdraws a service and community volunteers offer to run it.

Chief executive of Volunteering England, Justin Davis Smith said: “There is a danger that volunteers are seen as a way of reducing costs, and that undermines staff jobs and is extremely damaging to the perception of volunteering.”

Advice

The guide reminds organisations of the Volunteering England and Trade Union Congress (TUC) charter for strengthening relations between paid staff and volunteers and says: “One of the key principles of this charter is that the involvement of volunteers should complement and supplement the work of paid staff. They should not displace paid staff or undercut their pay and conditions of service.”

In the new guidance Volunteering England recommends that charities consult with trade unions, staff and the community about volunteer involvement, create a volunteering policy, and agree the roles and responsibilities of volunteers.

The guidance also suggests taking steps to encourage working relationships between staff and volunteers, for example by inviting volunteers to meetings and including them in training sessions.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Action for Children plans to boost investment in fundraising

23 Sep 2014

Action for Children is planning to boost its investment in fundraising in a bid to offset the vagaries...

Too many charities 'moan and whinge', says Scope CEO

23 Sep 2014

Most charities would prefer to “moan and whinge about how hard life is” rather than innovate to drive...

Kids Company could close without more government funding

22 Sep 2014

The chief executive of the children’s charity Kids Company has said that it is at risk of closure unless...

UK Community Foundations wants government to discourage new private trusts

23 Sep 2014

Umbrella body UK Community Foundations has recommended tougher restrictions on private trusts in order...

National Children’s Bureau sells publishing arm to commercial publisher

23 Sep 2014

National Children's Bureau has sold its book publishing arm to commercial publisher Jessica Kingsley Publishers...

Kids Company could close without more government funding

22 Sep 2014

The chief executive of the children’s charity Kids Company has said that it is at risk of closure unless...

JustGiving page for Manchester Dogs’ Home receives four donations a second

15 Sep 2014

JustGiving has said that donations going to an appeal for the Manchester Dogs’ Home following an arson...

Commission's new online charity search to launch soon after delay

15 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission’s searchable online register of charities is due to launch in beta this autumn,...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance