Share

Volunteering England warns against 'job substitution'

Justin Davis Smith, chief executive, Volunteering England
News

Volunteering England warns against 'job substitution'

Governance | Kirsty Weakley | 19 Apr 2012

Volunteering England has warned organisations against job substitution, stating that it risks damaging the reputation of volunteering.

The organisation has today published A guide to avoiding job substitution in partnership with Locality, Navca and NCVO to explain how charities should manage situations so that volunteers do not, or are not perceived to, take on roles that were previously done by paid members of staff.

Job substitution is when volunteers replace paid members of staff. Volunteering England says that in extreme cases this occurs when jobs are cut and volunteers are recruited to fill gaps. At the other end of the spectrum it can occur when a charity withdraws a service and community volunteers offer to run it.

Chief executive of Volunteering England, Justin Davis Smith said: “There is a danger that volunteers are seen as a way of reducing costs, and that undermines staff jobs and is extremely damaging to the perception of volunteering.”

Advice

The guide reminds organisations of the Volunteering England and Trade Union Congress (TUC) charter for strengthening relations between paid staff and volunteers and says: “One of the key principles of this charter is that the involvement of volunteers should complement and supplement the work of paid staff. They should not displace paid staff or undercut their pay and conditions of service.”

In the new guidance Volunteering England recommends that charities consult with trade unions, staff and the community about volunteer involvement, create a volunteering policy, and agree the roles and responsibilities of volunteers.

The guidance also suggests taking steps to encourage working relationships between staff and volunteers, for example by inviting volunteers to meetings and including them in training sessions.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

FRSB rejects complaint against the RSPB

25 Jul 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has thrown out a complaint that the RSPB’s Abernethy Forest appeal made...

Culture, Media and Sport Committee launches inquiry into society lotteries

25 Jul 2014

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has launched an inquiry into society lotteries that will...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Commission clarifies statements on staff attendance at board meetings

25 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has rewritten its operational compliance report on the case of Southwark Muslim...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance