Share

Female charity interim managers paid 15 per cent less than men

Female charity interim managers paid 15 per cent less than men
News

Female charity interim managers paid 15 per cent less than men2

Finance | Tania Mason | 9 Mar 2010

Female interim managers working in charities earned 15 per cent less than their male counterparts during the six months from June to December last year, new research shows.

Women charity interims earned an average of £466.50 a day compared with £537.50 per day for men.

The figures, released this week by recruitment agency Russam GMS, show that the disparity between men and women in the charity sector is twice as big as the difference between male and female interims generally.

Ian Joseph, head of the not-for-profit practice at Russam, said the scale of the disparity prompted the agency to investigate further, and it conducted a basic poll of a number of its charity interims.

“We wanted to find out if there was any difference in women’s and men’s attitudes to three different things – money, negotiation, and how prepared they were to reduce their rates in order to secure a job,” he said.

“But we found there was no difference between them at all in terms of the willingness to negotiate or be pragmatic and accept lower rates than they were used to.”

Higher-paid posts attract more men

Therefore, the only explanation Joseph could fathom for the disparity is that the roles that tend to be higher-paid, such as chief executive or finance director jobs, also tend to attract more male applicants.

“In my years of experience as a recruiter, shortlists for FDs are generally all or predominantly male, whereas interim jobs in HR or fundraising, which are not quite as well-paid, generally attract more women.

“That’s the only explanation I can think of,” said Joseph. “Of course fundamentally it’s wrong, and even worse that there is more disparity in a sector that espouses diversity and equality.”

The inequality of opportunity and reward between the genders has been thrust into the spotlight this week in a number of ways following International Women’s Day on Monday. Channel 4 has released a report showing that women are outnumbered two to one by men on TV; Gordon Brown has threatened “serious action” to force companies to appoint more female directors, and a coalition of charities led by the Fawcett Society has launched a ‘What about women?’ campaign to encourage the political parties to pay more attention to women voters in the election campaign.

However, the gender disparity in pay for charity interims comes against a backdrop of better news generally - overall pay for charity interims rose by 4 per cent over the six months. The study showed that the average daily rate in the voluntary sector rose from £499 in June 2009 to £521 in December 2009.

Rowena Lewis
Head of Fundraising and Development
The Fawcett Society
11 Mar 2010

Thanks for highlighting Tania.

So we now know that women interim managers are paid 15% less than men in the same role, that the pay gap between male and female fundraising directors stands at 11.5%, and that female CEOs are paid on average £7,550 less than their male counterparts.

The stark reality is that the sector that prides itself on championing social justice harbours its own unacceptable gender pay gap.

Can we afford the implication that women are worth 15% less than their male counterparts? Of course not. It's high time voluntary sector employers and key sector bodies united to identify where pay discrepancies lie, and to begin to address the gender pay gap.

Only then can we hold a mirror to the sector and boast that we not only champion social justice for our beneficiaries, but practice what we preach with our people.

Sue Donoghue
participant
women's mental health
13 Mar 2010
Response to [ Rowena Lewis]

Siiiiigh! It would be interesting to pull apart the statistics. What exactly was being compared? How are the benchmarks for the salaries of such posts created?

For example, were all the posts that were considerd part of national organisations or subject to local market forces?

Was it that where a post was advertised with a salary band, females disproportionately started at and stayed at,the lower end? How many of the posts had been long established and therefore had a historically rated remuneration? How many accepted the posts based on ethical factors, for example, knowing the post was slightly under remunerated, working for that particular organisatin/sector made the sacrifice worthwhile?

Having worked with a Local Authority in a Trade Union role as they addressed their pay inequality under Single Status... I know that to truly make a difference requires time, resources and committment, but doing nothing or leaving the sector to patchwork piecemeal action will make the mountain harder to climb and efforts expended will be swallowed by the bigger aniamal.
Onwards and upwards : )

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Age UK spends £1.8m in latest round of redundancies

21 Oct 2014

Age UK spent £1.81m on 120 redundancies in 2014, on top of £1.17m last year, as part of a review of...

Stand Up To Cancer raises over £14.5m

21 Oct 2014

This weekend's Stand Up To Cancer event has raised over £14.5m so far, and that figure is continuing...

Charities 'must continue to fight for the right to influence policy'

20 Oct 2014

Civil society organisations must not give up the fight to influence policy and governments, the international...

Age UK spends £1.8m in latest round of redundancies

21 Oct 2014

Age UK spent £1.81m on 120 redundancies in 2014, on top of £1.17m last year, as part of a review of...

Addaction and KCA merge to become leading provider of recovery services

21 Oct 2014

Addiction charities Addaction and KCA will merge next year to form what is likely to be one of the 90...

Voluntary sector sees “revolving door” of staff, says report

20 Oct 2014

The voluntary sector is experiencing a “revolving door” of staff with employee turnover levels at...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Nesta has made no grants to charities from its Impact Investments Fund

16 Oct 2014

Only 15 per cent of applications to a Nesta fund to invest in innovations to help older people, children...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance