Share

Government rejects call for lobbying register

Government rejects call for lobbying register
News

Government rejects call for lobbying register

Finance | Tania Mason | 27 Oct 2009

The government has rejected a call from the Public Administration Select Committee to set up a statutory register of lobbying activity, disappointing charities who argued strongly for such a register during evidence hearings last year.

In its response to the PASC report Lobbying: Access and influence in Whitehall, the government decided that the lobbying industry should be given the opportunity to self-regulate effectively before being saddled with the obligation to record every meeting in a public register.

The government did accept some of the Committee’s recommendations.  All departments will have to publish online quarterly reports detailing ministerial meetings with interest groups and hospitality received by ministers and their advisers, and the list of civil servants who will have to publish details of hospitality and expenses will be extended. 

But as well as dismissing the Committee’s case for a statutory lobbying register, the government did not accept that details of meetings between officials and outside groups should be published, and has not specified a timeframe within which it will assess whether self-regulation is working.

Dr Tony Wright MP, PASC chair (pictured), said he was disappointed about the government’s refusal to establish a register, but still felt “this is where I think we will eventually end up”.

In his evidence to the Committee hearings in May last year, Friends of the Earth (FoE) corporates campaigner Owen Espley argued for much greater transparency and accountability in lobbying and that a mandatory register would go a long way to bring this about.

Espley said similar registers in North America have successfully opened up the lobbying industry to greater public scrutiny, and that certain thresholds ensure that smaller groups aren’t burdened with red tape in complying with them.

Responding to the government’s position, David Miller of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency, which counts FoE, Greenpeace and Amnesty Internationals as members, said “self-regulation is no regulation” and that asking the public to trust lobbyists to operate transparently is “like asking us to trust MPs on expenses”.

“The government has dropped the ball on political reform and ignored public concerns by refusing to force lobbyists to operate in the open,” Miller said.

“In June, Gordon Brown said that the future was about opening up areas of public life that have been too secretive. This must include the massive and growing influence commercial lobbying has on public life.”

The Alliance will continue to campaign for a mandatory register.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Macmillan's voluntary income soars by £34.1m

31 Jul 2014

Macmillan Cancer Support raised £186.9m in 2013 – an increase of £34.1m on the previous year, according...

Half of hospices in England saw NHS funding cut or frozen this year

31 Jul 2014

Half of hospices in England have had their statutory funding from the NHS either cut or frozen this year,...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

Savile charity to challenge victim compensation scheme

31 Jul 2014

The Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust has been granted permission to appeal against the agreed system of compensation...

Cranfield Trust endorses stricter rules for new charities

31 Jul 2014

The Cranfield Trust has added its voice to the view that there are too many charities, recommending to...

Charity Commission to meet Society Network Foundation trustees this week

30 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission is meeting with the trustees of Society Network Foundation this week in an attempt...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance