Share

Government rejects call for lobbying register

Government rejects call for lobbying register
News

Government rejects call for lobbying register

Finance | Tania Mason | 27 Oct 2009

The government has rejected a call from the Public Administration Select Committee to set up a statutory register of lobbying activity, disappointing charities who argued strongly for such a register during evidence hearings last year.

In its response to the PASC report Lobbying: Access and influence in Whitehall, the government decided that the lobbying industry should be given the opportunity to self-regulate effectively before being saddled with the obligation to record every meeting in a public register.

The government did accept some of the Committee’s recommendations.  All departments will have to publish online quarterly reports detailing ministerial meetings with interest groups and hospitality received by ministers and their advisers, and the list of civil servants who will have to publish details of hospitality and expenses will be extended. 

But as well as dismissing the Committee’s case for a statutory lobbying register, the government did not accept that details of meetings between officials and outside groups should be published, and has not specified a timeframe within which it will assess whether self-regulation is working.

Dr Tony Wright MP, PASC chair (pictured), said he was disappointed about the government’s refusal to establish a register, but still felt “this is where I think we will eventually end up”.

In his evidence to the Committee hearings in May last year, Friends of the Earth (FoE) corporates campaigner Owen Espley argued for much greater transparency and accountability in lobbying and that a mandatory register would go a long way to bring this about.

Espley said similar registers in North America have successfully opened up the lobbying industry to greater public scrutiny, and that certain thresholds ensure that smaller groups aren’t burdened with red tape in complying with them.

Responding to the government’s position, David Miller of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency, which counts FoE, Greenpeace and Amnesty Internationals as members, said “self-regulation is no regulation” and that asking the public to trust lobbyists to operate transparently is “like asking us to trust MPs on expenses”.

“The government has dropped the ball on political reform and ignored public concerns by refusing to force lobbyists to operate in the open,” Miller said.

“In June, Gordon Brown said that the future was about opening up areas of public life that have been too secretive. This must include the massive and growing influence commercial lobbying has on public life.”

The Alliance will continue to campaign for a mandatory register.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Unicef raises £3.1m from Commonwealth Games opening ceremony appeal

24 Jul 2014

Unicef raised £3.1m through text and online donations from UK viewers watching the Commonwealth Games’...

People think charities spend just two-fifths of their income on 'the cause', research shows

24 Jul 2014

People think charities spend just 38 per cent of their income on ‘the cause’, but they believe organisations...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Workfare charities set to be named after Tribunal rules against DWP

23 Jul 2014

Charities that are involved in the workfare programme run by the Department for Work and Pensions look...

Dove Trust charities will be paid a third of what they are owed

23 Jul 2014

The charities and good causes owed money by the Dove Trust, owner of the suspended fundraising website...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance