Share

Social impact bonds ‘will become the norm’ for government funding, says charities minister

 Social impact bonds ‘will become the norm’ for government funding, says charities minister
News

Social impact bonds ‘will become the norm’ for government funding, says charities minister4

Finance | David Ainsworth | 3 Mar 2016

Social impact bonds will shortly be the most talked about method of public funding, Rob Wilson, the minister for civil society said yesterday.

Wilson gave a speech in London to the Social Investment Academy, an organisation which is designed to encourage investors to focus on social returns. He told delegates that social impact bonds were a “no-brainer” and that “the time for social investment has arrived”.

A social impact bond is a type of payment-by-results contract where a charity is backed by an investor to deliver a service to government, with agreed targets, such as decreasing obesity among a target population or reducing reoffending in particular area. The government only pays if the charity hits its targets, and the investor share the risk.

“Social impact bonds are barely mentioned in the media today,” Wilson said. “In a few years’ time they will be the most talked about funding mechanism for government social projects. I will be talking about them a lot.

“Social investment is growing. It will play an increasing role in how the sector will be funded and there is a role for all of us in achieving this. Social investment can accelerate the growth of new businesses, transform the impact of our public services and support stronger communities to tackle the social challenges that they face.”

Wilson also said he had embarked on a programme to reform the charity sector to make it work better.

“I’m pleased to inform you today that this government has embarked on a somewhat overdue and ambitious reform programme for charities and social enterprises,” Wilson said.

“It is my aim to deliver a sector that is more independent, more resilient and more sustainable. Better able to meet the many challenges that it faces.”

In an interview with Civil Society News earlier this year he said he wants to create a market for social impact bonds worth “at least £1bn” by the end of the Parliament.

 

Colin Davies
Director
C21 Consulting
5 Apr 2016

I like the idea of Social Impact Bonds and politically it's not unusual for things like this to be heralded as the next big thing. To offer one solution as a panacea for charity funding does however demonstrate a poor understanding of the sector and its complexity. The sector needs a rich mix of funding mechanisms and will do for some time to come even when you're talking about the narrow field of government work or contracted delivery. Having said that the sector is facing a crisis of change and I welcome measures which offer a way to secure long term financial sustainability for the third sector.

Rarry Revan
Ranter
Rantingrules
4 Mar 2016

“Social impact bonds are barely mentioned in the media today,” Wilson said. “In a few years’ time they will be the most talked about funding mechanism for government social projects. I will be talking about them a lot."

That is assuming you are still the minister for kicking charities in the future Rob and not shafting another part of society that might shine some light on the government's lack of effectiveness.

R

Barney Mynott
NAVCA
3 Mar 2016

To say this will be the norm for funding is a bit depressing - and very short sighted. There is a role for social impact bonds but they need to be used alongside other forms of funding. And grants are a key part.

Why set about tackling issues without giving yourself the full range of tools available?

Sir Robin Bogg
CEO
BUBB
3 Mar 2016

Is this the big announcement you have been teasing us with, Rob?

The one that will make people "look a bit silly"? I note you don't actually offer any detail as to exactly what you have embarked on.

Which is a bit silly.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

‘There’s no question Oxfam was culpable in fundraising scandals’, says Mark Goldring

30 Sep 2016

Oxfam was culpable in fundraising scandals of last summer because it failed to supervise its contractors,...

‘Charities do not have the technology to comply with the Fundraising Preference Service’

30 Sep 2016

Only a handful of large charities have the technological tools to comply with the Fundraising Preference...

Sport Relief 2016 raises record £72.5m

30 Sep 2016

Comic Relief has announced that its biennial fundraising event, Sport Relief, raised a record £72.5m,...

'Stop accusing volunteers of replacing paid staff; those jobs are never coming back'

29 Sep 2016

People should stop moaning about volunteers replacing paid staff because those jobs are never coming back,...

Labour MP wants National Citizen Service to be rolled out in Wales

29 Sep 2016

A Labour MP has urged the Welsh government and Westminster to agree to bring National Citizen Service...

We need the press to investigate the larger charities, says CEO of Media Trust

29 Sep 2016

Caroline Diehl, chief executive of the Media Trust, has said that it is important that charities are scrutinised...

‘Charities do not have the technology to comply with the Fundraising Preference Service’

30 Sep 2016

Only a handful of large charities have the technological tools to comply with the Fundraising Preference...

Eduserv agrees £138,000 payment to retiring CEO without telling full board

26 Sep 2016

Eduserv, a charity that provides IT services to the public sector, agreed to pay its retiring chief executive...

Barnardo’s launches ten-year strategy with plans to double fundraising income

22 Sep 2016

Barnardo’s has announced a ten-year strategy which will aim to grow income by a third and change its...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance