Share

Charity sector calls on Prime Minister to overturn anti-advocacy clauses

Charity sector calls on Prime Minister to overturn anti-advocacy clauses
News

Charity sector calls on Prime Minister to overturn anti-advocacy clauses

Finance | Kirsty Weakley | 11 Feb 2016

More than 140 charity leaders have written to the Prime Minister calling on him to reverse the decision to add an anti-advocacy clause into grant agreements.

Matthew Hancock, minister for the Cabinet Office, made the announcement on Saturday and since then several people have come out against the measure, including a senior Conservative MP.

Today’s letter to David Cameron was co-ordinated by NCVO. It has been signed by Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of Acevo, Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of NCVO, John Low, chief executive of Charities Aid Foundation and Caron Bradshaw, chief executive of Charity Finance Group.

The letter highlights a number of examples where the new clause would be damaging.

“In October 2015, you announced a £5m grant fund for charities as part of the government’s counter-extremism strategy. As currently drafted, the new clause will undermine the ability of these charities to feed in valuable insights that may help government – those working on programmes receiving any grant funding would be prohibited from speaking to MPs,” it said.

It also draws attention to previous statements that Cameron has made regarding charities and the Compact and said that “the ability of voluntary organisations to campaign, regardless of any financial relationship, is a defining characteristic of this relationship”.

“Abandoning this protection is surely not the intended consequence of these proposals, as their impact runs contrary to the relationship you have sought to develop. As such, we urge you to reconsider them and work with the voluntary sector to find a constructive way forward,” the letter concluded.

Charlotte Ravenscroft, head of policy and public services, said that there had been “strong support” for the letter. She added that she hopes that after hearing from the sector the Prime Minister “will realise the impact that the plans could have”.

Each government department is expected to now begin consulting on how to implement the changes, and Ravenscroft called for these to be “formal public consultations so that we have the opportunity to discuss in detail with ministers what the impact is on their department”.

Clause 'is compatible with the Compact'

Yesterday in the House of Lords, Lord Harries of Pentregarth, a crossbench peer, asked how the government planned to implement the new policy.

Lord Bridges of Headley, Conservative peer and the Cabinet Office spokesman in the Lords, said that in “exceptional circumstances” ministers would be able to change or remove the clause and that each department is being “encouraged to engage with any grant recipients who are likely to be affected by the clause”.

He added that “charities will be able to provide advice and guidance to government if it is part of the work that they are being paid to do”.

“The government believe that the new clause is compatible with the Compact and does not in any way prevent grant recipients from campaigning and lobbying, using their other funds. It simply requires clarity on what the grant funding can be used for.”

He said that since the Department for Communities and Local Government started trialling the clause it has funded 56 organisations, including Shelter, which is currently lobbying politicians about its Power to Renters campaign. And that the department had not received any complaints. 

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town, Labour peer, criticised the timing of the announcement, which came shortly after the Charities Bill was finalised.

“Did the minister know about it on Tuesday when we completed it and would it not have been better to announce it then, when there could have been a debate on this important matter in Parliament, rather than issuing it by diktat?” she said.

Lord Bridges replied that the new clause was wider than just the charity sector as it applies to all organisations receiving grants.

Shadow minister for civil society, Anna Turley, said on Twitter that her request for an urgent debate in Parliament had been declined and that she is now seeking a Westminster Hall debate.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Macmillan holds onto top spot in charity brand index mid-year ranking

26 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support has come top of the mid-year rankings for YouGov’s charity brand index, which...

No date set for PFRA to agree merger with IoF as deadline looms

26 Jul 2016

A date for the PFRA’s Extraordinary General Meeting at which members will vote on the organisation’s...

Fundraising Regulator should seek government funding, says consultation response

25 Jul 2016

The Directory of Social change has called for the Fundraising Regulator to seek a “statutory grant to...

Charity Commission opens investigation into youth charity that ignored advice on conflicts of interest

26 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into a young people’s charity over concerns about...

Trustees disqualified after charity provides platform to terrorist leader

25 Jul 2016

A Kurdish charity has been removed from the register of charities and its board disqualified from trusteeship...

NCVO launches the next stage of its programme to improve trust and confidence in charities

22 Jul 2016

NCVO is to launch a website explaining how charities work along with a communications toolkit for charities...

Blockchain technology could ‘revolutionise’ charity regulation, says report

21 Jul 2016

Blockchain technology could eventually be used to carry out many of the functions of a traditional regulator,...

Macmillan, Cancer Research UK and Brooke use Pokemon Go to encourage fundraising

14 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support, Cancer Research UK and Brooke are among the charities to encourage fundraising...

Stop looking for a 'big bang' moment for digital transformation

4 Jul 2016

Charities should stop looking for a “big bang” moment in digital transformation and instead focus...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance