Share

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure
News

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure

Finance | Jonathan Last | 2 Aug 2012

The London Civic Forum is to close, blaming a lack of political support for its work, and ending the civic participation organisation’s 12-year presence in the capital.

The decision to close at the end of September was described in a statement by the Forum as “a voluntary dissolution of the organisation” and the group now plans to transfer its work to another, as yet unnamed, charity.

Already-scheduled work will still go ahead, including the creation of a digital resource archive and several events.

“London Civic Forum’s [LCF] closure is announced at a time when civic safeguards are needed as never before, with support for engagement and public accountability being eroded at a break-neck pace,” said Lorraine Roberts, LCF’s interim director. 

“This is a time when LCF should be increasing its services, however, due in large part to seeming lack of political will from some quarters and the related reductions in public sector funding, support for LCF’s work is not a fiscal priority, and so LCF has to close.”

Further announcements will be made soon to confirm the transfer of LCF’s on-going work and the availability of the digital archive resource.

Civic society ‘not a political priority’

Roberts lamented that this turn of events means that LCF’s work will “never be done”.

“For London to thrive, the voices of all its communities need to be heard, and that can only be done through strong, committed civic engagement support,” she said.

“Unfortunately, what is required right now is a huge mustering of forces at a time when a civic society is not a political priority.

“A massive effort is needed to make sure that the most vulnerable aren’t lost even further from their rightful place in helping to shape London into a city for all its citizens.”

Contribution to Olympic bid

Since its inception in 1990, LCF’s has been involved in many civic projects in the nation’s capital.

It designed a toolkit for the Greater London Authority for its consultations with voluntary and community organisations on the Mayor’s spatial development strategy.   

The Forum also contributed to the London Olympic bid by holding community events in order to collect its members’ views on volunteering opportunities, local planning and furthering access to training and jobs.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Study finds that men donate more to charity when the fundraiser is an attractive female

17 Apr 2015

Men donate more to online fundraising pages where the fundraiser is an attractive female, and donate competitively...

Legion condemns poppy use on Ukip campaign advert

17 Apr 2015

The Royal British Legion has said that it is working to make sure that its poppy is “never again”...

Oxfam trials tap-to-donate technology

17 Apr 2015

Oxfam GB is running a trial of near-field communication technology to allow supporters to both donate...

National Theatre's first chief executive quits citing problems with leadership structure

17 Apr 2015

The National Theatre's first chief executive, Tessa Ross, has resigned after five months at the organisation,...

Legion condemns poppy use on Ukip campaign advert

17 Apr 2015

The Royal British Legion has said that it is working to make sure that its poppy is “never again”...

MoJ stops short of formal investigation into PCC who awarded £500,000 to her own organisation

17 Apr 2015

The Ministry of Justice has said it is not launching a formal investigation into Northumbria police and...

Oxfam trials tap-to-donate technology

17 Apr 2015

Oxfam GB is running a trial of near-field communication technology to allow supporters to both donate...

Ice Bucket Challenge effect brings down average online donation amount

15 Apr 2015

The average online donation fell by 8.6 per cent in 2014 to £63.69, according to a survey by fundraising...

Education charity UCAS broke electronic marketing rules, says Information Commissioner

9 Apr 2015

The Universities and Colleges Admissions Service broke electronic marketing rules because its admission...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance