Share

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure
News

London Civic Forum blames lack of political support for closure

Finance | Jonathan Last | 2 Aug 2012

The London Civic Forum is to close, blaming a lack of political support for its work, and ending the civic participation organisation’s 12-year presence in the capital.

The decision to close at the end of September was described in a statement by the Forum as “a voluntary dissolution of the organisation” and the group now plans to transfer its work to another, as yet unnamed, charity.

Already-scheduled work will still go ahead, including the creation of a digital resource archive and several events.

“London Civic Forum’s [LCF] closure is announced at a time when civic safeguards are needed as never before, with support for engagement and public accountability being eroded at a break-neck pace,” said Lorraine Roberts, LCF’s interim director. 

“This is a time when LCF should be increasing its services, however, due in large part to seeming lack of political will from some quarters and the related reductions in public sector funding, support for LCF’s work is not a fiscal priority, and so LCF has to close.”

Further announcements will be made soon to confirm the transfer of LCF’s on-going work and the availability of the digital archive resource.

Civic society ‘not a political priority’

Roberts lamented that this turn of events means that LCF’s work will “never be done”.

“For London to thrive, the voices of all its communities need to be heard, and that can only be done through strong, committed civic engagement support,” she said.

“Unfortunately, what is required right now is a huge mustering of forces at a time when a civic society is not a political priority.

“A massive effort is needed to make sure that the most vulnerable aren’t lost even further from their rightful place in helping to shape London into a city for all its citizens.”

Contribution to Olympic bid

Since its inception in 1990, LCF’s has been involved in many civic projects in the nation’s capital.

It designed a toolkit for the Greater London Authority for its consultations with voluntary and community organisations on the Mayor’s spatial development strategy.   

The Forum also contributed to the London Olympic bid by holding community events in order to collect its members’ views on volunteering opportunities, local planning and furthering access to training and jobs.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Fundraisers too bound up by red tape, says Unicef fundraising director

18 Sep 2014

Fundraisers are too bound up by red tape which prevents them from innovating, an audience of senior fundraisers...

Charities should be 'critical friends' to their corporate partners

17 Sep 2014

Charities should approach corporate partnerships as “critical friends” if they are going to change...

Teenage Cancer Trust reveals £5m Stephen Sutton legacy

16 Sep 2014

Teenage Cancer Trust has announced it intends to spend the £5m raised by Stephen Sutton to fund new specialist...

Some charity leaders see themselves as ‘employees of government’

18 Sep 2014

Voluntary bodies and the state have become so intertwined that some charity leaders whose organisations...

Charity Commission launches inquiry into Worldwide Ummah Aid

18 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Worldwide Ummah Aid after concerns that a trustee...

CAN and Senscot part ways with UnLtd over its vision for a 'private-profit social sector'

18 Sep 2014

Social enterprise support organisations CAN and Senscot have ended their relationship with UnLtd, set...

JustGiving page for Manchester Dogs’ Home receives four donations a second

15 Sep 2014

JustGiving has said that donations going to an appeal for the Manchester Dogs’ Home following an arson...

Commission's new online charity search to launch soon after delay

15 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission’s searchable online register of charities is due to launch in beta this autumn,...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance