Ring-fence early years funding, says taskforce

Finance | Gareth Jones | 28 Jun 2011

A taskforce composed of children’s charities is calling on the government to ring-fence the Early Intervention Grant and make reforms in order to protect the UK’s early years services.

The taskforce was created by Acevo, and has produced a report entitled One Million Reasons for Reform, which argues that many early years services are under significant pressure.

It points to research which suggests that as many as 250 children’s centres are expected to close in 2011-12.

In addition to ring-fencing for local authorities’ use of the Early Intervention Grant, the report calls for:

Better engagement with the voluntary sector in developing policy
Reform of public sector pensions and VAT so that voluntary organisations can better compete with local council-run services
A step change in the quality of council commissioning practice

The report also sets out key principles by which payment by results should be introduced for finding children’s centres.

Members of the taskforce include 4Children, Action for Children, Barnardo’s and the Children’s Society. They will meet with the Children’s minister Sarah Teather to discuss the report shortly.

Speaking about the report, Anne Longfield, chair of the taskforce chief executive of 4Children, said: "Government has made a commitment to making early intervention a priority. But without fundamental reform and protection of funding, we risk going into reverse rather than making progress.

“Success would mean millions of lives improved, and billions saved further down the line in public spending. Failure would mean a worse start in life for millions of children, and taxpayers sitting on a fiscal time bomb."

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | Action for Children | Barnardo's | Children's Society

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.