Small voluntary organisations to play "crucial" role in Work Programme 1

Finance | Gareth Jones | 5 Jan 2011

Prime contractors for the government’s Work Programme will have to prove that they are developing partnerships with small, specialist voluntary sector providers in order to win contracts.

Launched late last month, the reformed welfare-to-work provisions require contractors to be compliant with the Merlin Standard, which specifies that they must demonstrate “how the development of supply chain partners including small, specialist and voluntary sector providers is supported and encouraged”.

A statement from the Department for Work and Pensions added: “Crucial to the success of the Work Programme will be the work done by smaller local, voluntary and community sector organisations which specialise in working with the hardest to help groups.

“Major organisations wanting to bid for Work Programme contracts have been told that they will only succeed if they put together groups of specialists who can deliver the right mix of expertise for the hardest to help.”

Prime contractors will also have to treat partner organisations fairly or face losing their contract.

The new scheme will be based on payment by results, with providers only receiving the bulk of the money if their clients stay in they job for a period of time.

The tendering process for the Work Programme is now underway.

Place a comment

Pete
5 Jan 2011

Interesting article. Does this mean maybe that contract holders will financially support those it NEEDS for placements? Trainees and students alike drink coffee etc - it is only fair that the 'experience' be a properly supported one instead of requiring the 'host' to effectively subsidise the 'personnel provider' in this case.

If you're going to do it, do it right.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.