£1.5bn Big Society Bank fund hangs in balance as banking talks fail 1

Finance | Niki May Young | 13 Dec 2010

Secret talks between a number of the UK’s major banks, which are said to include plans to provide £1.5bn to the Big Society Bank, have broken down, the Sunday Telegraph has reported.

Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Royal Bank of Scotland and Santander UK were rumoured to be involved in Project Merlin, as the action was code-named, to discuss ways to u-turn the banking sector’s image crisis. On the table was the possibility of reducing the industry’s £7bn annual bonus payouts for staff to £4bn and to furnish the Big Society Bank with up to £1.5bn of these savings.

But the Sunday Telegraph reports that talks have ended without a “definitive pact” because of tensions between those directly involved in discussions, and those on the fringes over what the project’s aims should be.

The Big Society Bank is to launch in April next year with an estimated £60m, providing financial products and services for the sector. When announced, the Cabinet Office advised that the amount of funds available would be determined by the number of banks and building societies participating in the scheme. Until Project Merlin rumours were revealed, dormant accounts were said to be the largest likely contributor, set to provide between £300 and £400m of funding.

Nesta kept out of the loop

Project Merlin was headed by outgoing Barclay's Bank boss John Varley. It is reported that the original basis of the talks was to produce a "clearing of air" between banks and the government. But a spokesperson for the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (Nesta), which was appointed by the government to pilot products and services for the Big Society Bank, as well as determine the appetite for investment in the Bank, advised that it has not been directly consulted or involved in Project Merlin.

Some had hoped that the talks would produce dramatic results for civil society organisations. Lord Myners, trustee of the Tate and Glyndebourne and business secretary under the Labour government said in a statement to the Guardian last week that, "Banks should show they are committed to rebuilding their reputation and public trust by offering the entire charity sector completely free banking, as part of Project Merlin."

The Cabinet Office meanwhile remains sheepish about the amount of funding potentially lost in the breakdown of discussions. A spokesperson for the Office said: "As with all major industries, we are in disucssions with the banking sector on a number of topics but it would be inappropriate to provide a running commentary of our conversations," adding that the figure of £1.5bn was, "just speculation, it's not a figure we've ever released and discussions are ongoing."

Place a comment

Jeff Mowatt
Director
People-Centered Economic Development
13 Dec 2010

The Sky news article on these talks aroused my interest in referencing investment in CDFIs which was the essence of what we put forward as a business plan 6 years ago to propagate rural broadband and invest profits in social enterprise startups.

The paper, particularly the History and Vision will be interesting when considering David Cameron's vision of capitalism with a conscience.

Absolutely no social lender would touch it at the time.

http://www.box.net/shared/y3tpik8eg6

The relevance of broadband deployment was to hit Nesta soon after the credit crisis and we were kept out of the loop as they are now it seems.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.