Government urges Commission to steer guidance towards social investment

Finance | Tania Mason | 9 Nov 2010

The government has given the Charity Commission a “very clear steer” that it should change its investment guidance to give charities more leeway to invest in products that offer social as well as financial returns, minister for civil society Nick Hurd said today.

At a seminar on social investment organised by J.P. Morgan, Hurd said he was aware that many foundations with large endowments felt restricted by existing Commission guidance on investments. He went on to say that the Commission “has received a very clear steer from us about a more positive attitude to social investment”.

Existing guidance emphasises the legal requirements of investor charities to maximise returns, so if charities want to invest in new products that balance financial returns with social impacts, the message from the Commission is generally “discouraging”, Hurd said.

“They (charities) have told us that if we want them to be the trailblazers by investing in these new social investment vehicles we need to make sure the Charity Commission sends more positive messages,” he said.

He added that the government had no intention of changing the law but said he had had discussions with new Commission chief Sam Younger and asked him to explore how the regulator might send a more positive message to charities that want to dip their toe in social investment.

“The Commission is looking at that right now,” Hurd said.

But Julian Smith, partner at Farrer and Co, said that while updated guidance from the Commission would be helpful, it would still be merely guidance.

“I think it would be much more powerful to have some clear exemplars in the market and encouragement within the voluntary sector community at large for other organisations to join in as well,” Smith said.

Directory: Charity Commission | Office for Civil Society
Who's Who: Sam Younger | Nick Hurd

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.