Government social impact bonds trial set to exceed target 1

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 11 Aug 2010

The first social impact bond pilots by the Ministry of Justice look set to be oversubscribed with investors, according to Social Finance who is leading the £4.9m scheme.

The pilots are one of the first trials by the government to test ways of bringing private and social investment into the voluntary sector.

It will see a range of investors fund voluntary sector support for six years to around 3,000 prisoners in Peterborough, who have served less than 12 months of their sentences.

Financial returns to investors will be based on improved social outcomes. If the initiative reduces reoffending by 7.5 per cent or more compared with previous government initiatives, investors will receive a share of government savings. If the scheme achieves greater success, investors will receive an increasing return, up to a maximum of 13 per cent.

Social Finance, which is raising the £4.9m to fund the scheme, told Civil Society that it looked likely to be oversubscribed with investors.

Toby Eccles, development director at Social Finance, said: “We have got a formal agreement for over 80 per cent of the money, and in the pipeline remaining it is significantly over that 20 per cent. We will have more money than the £4.9m we need and we want to build on that success and do other pilots around the country of the £5m - £10m size.”

Eccles said the majority of investors have been charitable foundations, or individual investors coming through foundations. There has been only one commercial interest, who is still considering whether to invest.

Directory: Social Finance
Who's Who: Toby Eccles

Place a comment

C Longton
Trusts & Statutory Fundraising Manager
Target Ovarian Cancer
16 Aug 2010

"Eccles said the majority of investors have been charitable foundations, or individual investors coming through foundations. There has been only one commercial interest, who is still considering whether to invest."

Well, well, well. So much for bringing in new money then. I would really like to see their list of donors as I suspect that this is just circulating the same money via a different route that would have gone to charities anyway.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.