Charity Commission updates guidance on serious incident reporting

Finance | Niki May Young | 29 Jun 2010

New guidance released by the Charity Commission has relaxed rules on reporting minor fraud and theft but asserts that charities with annual income over £25,000 must inform the Charity Commission of any serious incident within their Annual Returns.

The update provides what the Commission calls “more proportionate” direction for reporting incidents with lesser significance. Within the ‘fraud, theft or significant loss of funds or other property’ guidance for example the Commission advises that for any losses less than £25,000 or 20 per cent of the charity’s income (whichever amount is lower) the trustees should decide whether to report this based on if it is significant to the charity or not.

For serious incidents, however, the Commission is taking a harder line: “As a matter of best practice the Commission recommends that trustees of all charities report any serious incidents to the Commission,” said a spokesperson for the Commission.

“However," they continued, "for charities with an income over £25,000 the trustees must, as part of the Annual Return, sign a declaration that there are no serious incidents that they should have brought to our attention but have not.

“If they are unable to make this declaration then the Annual Return is not complete and they will have not met their legal responsibilities.”

The Commission has seen a significant rise in the number of serious incidents reported with the latest figures showing a 75 per cent rise in 2009/10 which it attributes to greater awareness of the reporting requirements.

But it said there were still a great many incidents not being reported and the guidance includes further clarification on how to report an incident, confidentiality in reporting incidents and the Commission’s role in relation to other bodies upon reporting serious incidents.

What counts as a serious incident?

Fraud, theft or significant loss of funds or other property

Significant sums of money or other property donated to the charity from an unknown or unverified source

Any known or alleged links to a banned organisation, terrorist or other unlawful activity

Someone currently acting as a trustee who is disqualified from that role

Charities dealing with vulnerable beneficiaries not having a policy to safeguard them

No vetting procedure to ensure trustees or staff are eligible to act in that role

Suspicions, allegations and incidents of abuse or mistreatment of beneficiaries

The charity having been subject to a criminal investigation or one by another regulator or agency, or having had sanctions imposed or concerns raised by another regulator or agency, such as the Health and Safety Executive or Ofsted

Directory: Charity Commission

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.