Share

Government refuses to bail out Refugee and Migrant Justice

Government refuses to bail out Refugee and Migrant Justice
News

Government refuses to bail out Refugee and Migrant Justice1

Finance | Gareth Jones | 18 Jun 2010

Secretary of State for Justice Ken Clarke has blamed Refugee and Migrant Justice (RMJ) itself for its collapse, saying that all other organisations had managed to adjust to changes in the government’s legal aid payment system.

Speaking in a debate on the issue yesterday, Clarke (pictured) said: “The fixed fee system introduced three years ago by the last government is already being successfully used by the vast majority of not-for-profit organisations in this area of law.

“As other organisations have successfully made the transition, it is only reasonable to expect Refugee and Migrant Justice to do the same.”

Liberal Democrat deputy leader Simon Hughes added his voice to those questioning the change in the payment system, which means that organisations cannot claim the legal aid fees they have incurred until the case has been through every stage of appeal.

He argued that RMJ had reduced its costs by 40 per cent but still could not cope.

But Clarke reiterated: “As far as I am aware, this is the only organisation that proved in the end unable to manage its affairs and its finances to avoid the demise that has occurred.”

System is “value for money”

Clarke also emphasised that RMJ had received “substantial support” from the Legal Services Commission, more so than other organisations, to adjust to the change, said that he would not go back on the system as “it does provide value for money” and rejected calls to take money from the legal aid budget to rescue the organisation.

He mentioned the outcry following RMJ’s descent into administration, saying: “That body is briefing everybody through very extensive public relations activity: archbishops are writing to me, and everybody seems to be informed that the body has gone broke, but someone is still producing a great deal of campaigning material on its behalf.”

The Law Society, which has been outspoken in its criticism of the payment system, denied that inefficiencies at RMJ were to blame.

Chief executive Desmond Hudson said: “We have seen no evidence that the inefficiencies the government have hinted at were a significant issue.”

He added: "It is inaccurate to say, as the government has said, that all other organisations have coped. Two law centres - Gateshead and Cambridge - have closed in the past couple of years, partly because of this cash flow problem.

“Firms are also suffering, and have coped generally by increasing borrowing or reducing drawings.”

 Image courtesty of P. Vladi

PS Siu
Fundraiser
RNS
21 Jun 2010

Well, bottom line this becomes a public-sector cutback by any other name - RMJ was nearly 100% funded by legal aid payments.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

FRSB rejects complaint against the RSPB

25 Jul 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has thrown out a complaint that the RSPB’s Abernethy Forest appeal made...

Culture, Media and Sport Committee launches inquiry into society lotteries

25 Jul 2014

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has launched an inquiry into society lotteries that will...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

CLG seconded five staff to help set up Big Society Network

25 Jul 2014

The Department for Communities and Local Government seconded five civil servants to Big Society Network...

Commission clarifies statements on staff attendance at board meetings

25 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission has rewritten its operational compliance report on the case of Southwark Muslim...

Nandy demands PM inquiry into Big Society Network grants

24 Jul 2014

Lisa Nandy, the shadow minister for civil society, has written to David Cameron demanding an inquiry into...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Data protection proposals 'potentially catastrophic' for fundraising

8 Jul 2014

EU data protection proposals could have a “potentially catastrophic” impact on charity fundraising,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance