Tories emphasise payment by results

Finance | Celina Ribeiro | 19 Mar 2010

Charities will have more opportunity to win government contracts under a Conservative government, but it will also be expected to deliver much greater productivity and scale, Shadow Chancellor George Osbourne told a summit of civil society leaders yesterday.

In a Conservative Party summit hosted by Acevo in the same Westminster room where Tony Blair announced his triumphant Labour victory in 1997, the hopeful future chancellor told charity chief executives that "you should get paid by results".

He said that under Tory rule the sector could look forward to longer-term contracts, a more professional commissioning process, streamlined procurement process and a key role in public service provision. But he warned that his government would expect sector service providers be able to scale up, increase professionalism and provide value for money. "We need much greater productivity in the public service", said the minister.

Osbourne suggested moving away from a "process-based" payment scheme for contracts towards an impact-based approach would represent an administrative saving for charities undertaking public service provision.

But both Osbourne and the subsequent parade of Tory shadow cabinet ministers who spoke at the event admitted that the process would be difficult to implement. "We want to talk to you about how we can get payment by results going," he said.

The Conservative speakers also suggested that a reform of the way commissioners decide on contracts would also be a priority, with Philip Hammond MP commenting that "we will work on the commissioners... We will create a receptive audience of commissioners to new ideas."

Oliver Letwin said that payment by results will also "recognise that some people are harder to help than others" and look at introducing price differentials to reflect the disparity and avoid some charities picking only the low-hanging fruit for results-based contracts.

Meanwhile Lansley said that the shadow government would enact an "any willing provider policy" and that he could envision a set-up wherein third sector organisations themselves would be responsibile for commissioning.

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.