Paul Palmer steps down from expenses panel

Finance | Tania Mason | 4 Nov 2009

Professor Paul Palmer has stood down from the independent expert group on expenses in the wake of revelations that he also sits on the board of a for-profit company that has launched a software tool to help charities report their expenses.

In his place, the panel has appointed two new members – former chief Charity Commissioner John Stoker and academic Peter Grant.

In a statement, the expenses panel said it would like to thank Prof Palmer for his “valuable contribution”.

Charity Finance exposed the fact that Palmer was on the board of Charity Business as well as serving on the expenses panel two weeks ago, and called for him to step down. He had declared a conflict of interest to the board of Charity Business in September, but had not been upfront with the independent panel, and admitted that this was an error of judgement.

New members

John Stoker, who is now a consultant, was chief Charity Commissioner between 1999 and 2005, the first Commissioner for the Compact between 2006 and 2008 and currently serves on the Law Society's Audit Committee, as well as being a director of the Responsible Gambling Fund.

Peter Grant was director of operations at the New Opportunities Fund between 1999 and 2005, where he developed and delivered over £4.5bn of funding programmes. He has developed the world’s first full masters-level programme in grantmaking and philanthropy at Cass Business School, where he is academic leader of the philanthropy and grantmaking management and governance programmes.

The expenses panel is expecting to publish guidance for the sector around the end of the year.

Who's Who: Paul Palmer

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.