Share

Capacity benefits

Capacity benefits
News

Capacity benefits

Finance | Gareth Jones | 1 Mar 2006

ChangeUp, the government's project to build capacity and infrastructure in the voluntary sector, has been a matter of some controversy since its announcement in June 2004. Over eighteen months and almost £200 million later Capacity Builders, the organisation established to manage the programme at arms length from government and set to formally launch in April, faces some difficult questions.

Never shy of stirring things up, Directory of Social Change recently conducted a survey on people's views about ChangeUp. It received over 500 responses of which only 19 per cent said that they thought ChangeUp would make the sector more effective. Over a third said that they did not think that it would work and another third had no knowledge of it. If ChangeUp is to be successful then engaging with a sector that is both aware and supportive of its aims is crucial.

Other striking views emerged such as ChangeUp being just another government department by proxy and that while a very good idea in principle it will need to be properly funded and resourced in order for it to make any real difference. You could say the same thing about the Charity Commission, which must wonder what it has to do to get a pay rise out of Parliament, but that's another story!

These are all issues that Capacity Builders' new chief executive Simon Hebditch will be eager to get his teeth into, and he was very keen to be interviewed by Charity Finance prior to taking up the role at the beginning of February.

However, in an inauspicious start, it took many minutes and several dead ends through the Home Office's labyrinthine phone system to actually find anyone who was even aware of his existence a week after he started. Even then, he didn't have a contact phone number or email address. So much for building capacity and improved infrastructure.

I am sure Hebditch will readily and ably give his views on the challenges ahead over the next couple of months and we look forward to presenting them. In the meantime, let's hope that the largely negative reaction to the whole programme is not a sign that this will all prove to be a great waste of time. And money.

  

Double jeopardy

However hard to find the new ceo of ChangeUp may currently be, there was no difficulty spotting Stuart Etherington at NCVO's recent annual conference.

Having delivered Labour rising star David Miliband to speak on new Labour's new big idea, double devolution, Etherington cruised the Brewery pressing flesh with the growing number of people who are finally recognising the immense skill with which NCVO has lined up the government to a voluntary sector agenda.

So why the angry buzz around the mid morning coffee cups after golden boy Miliband had slipped away in his Jag for the short cruise back to his billet at ODPM? Could it be the mismatch between Miliband's rhetoric and the current realities of delegates' experiences?

With large chunks of ChangeUp money flowing through NCVO coffers via the four hubs it is effectively controlling, the gnomes of Kings Cross are now really settled in the voluntary sector driving seat. This money is supposed to help create the infrastructure and accountability improvements that the proposed flow of 'power to the people' will need in order to be sustainable.

Having cornered the lion's share of the funding and the political will to go with it, the problems for NCVO will come if it fails to embrace the many partnerships it needs to make ChangeUp actually work. Rightly or wrongly, there is a strong impression in the wider world that NCVO prefers to ignore anything that it hasn't invented. The message to NCVO should be loud and clear -  relax folks, you've done the hard work, now let the rest of us help take the strain!

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Public thinks volunteers more worthy of honours than charity professionals

23 May 2012

New research released by nfpSynergy claims that almost half the British public think that voluntary sector...

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter as well as raise awareness of its...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter as well as raise awareness of its...

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Marketers voice concerns over email conversion rates

21 May 2012

Conversion rates are the biggest concern for nearly half of all email marketers surveyed by the Direct...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance