Name of the game

Name of the game

Name of the game

Finance | Gareth Jones | 1 Apr 2006

Social enterprise (SE) isn't a new concept but is enjoying increased profile. What's in a name? Charity vs. social enterprise, acevo's recent event, was an intriguing day exploring this complex area. Charities were challenged to take a leaf out of the social enterprise book by demonstrating business skills and acumen, and building enterprise into the ethos of their organisation. Or what Alun Michael, the minister with responsibility for SE, called a shift "from the collection tin to the catalogue".

Social entrepreneur Liam Black, director of the Fifteen Foundation, gave a virtuoso performance in response, drawing on the transformation of the Liverpool-based Furniture Resource Centre from a small charity supplying second-hand furniture into a £5.5 million business group giving work to hundreds of people and providing thousands of low income families with the chance to buy quality recycled furniture. He described the way the sector is funded as "bizarre and disabling in the extreme" and said there is a sense that some charities see themselves as the end. Their survival becomes more important than those they are trying to help. Becoming more enterprising is one route out of this.

But Black also wisely cautioned that there has been too much hype around SE and there was no moral obligation on charities to turn into social enterprises. He highlighted the collapse of Sheffield Rebuild, a "vibrant example of social enterprise which went belly up because bad management and governance was exposed when the cash ran out". SE is high risk and high reward, not for the faint hearted and shouldn't be compulsory, especially when policy makers such as Michael have dangerously high expectations.

Clearly government sees charities as only part of a much wider picture and charities should be aware of that. But ultimately, it isn't about what charities, or social enterprises call themselves. It's about being good at what they do, and having strong governance structures in place if they want to successfully embed an enterprising culture.

Second hand arguments

But this continued focus on enterprise and a contract culture is also increasingly irritating some existing sore spots, for example the sensitive and poorly understood interface between for profit and not--for-profit businesses. Here one thing is clear, if charities and social enterprises want to hack off an ever bigger slice of the economic pie, then small business is going to get more and more vocal in its demands for a level playing field.

For example, the Forum of Private Business now tells us that the high street retail slump is being caused by the unfair tax advantage that charity shops have over other struggling retail outlets. It would appear that charity shops are being attacked because they are an easy target, despite the fact that only 0.2 per cent of retail spending goes through them (not 2 per cent as reported in another sector publication). Compare this to the fact that £1 in every £8 is spent at Tesco and it is obvious that the real problems for small businesses on the high street are the big supermarkets, as well as out of town shopping centres.

In this example, losing rates relief has always been a concern for charity shops, which would take a significant hit to profits if this were to happen. In fact, it would probably make life worse rather than better for other small retailers as there would no longer be any reason for charity shops to concentrate heavily on selling donated goods as they now do. But this is not the point. With small business struggling to survive, is it acceptable to give significant operating advantages to charities or other social enterprises? Even more, is it fair to levy ever higher taxes on businesses and the staff working in them while handing that tax on to their not for profit competitors? If we're not careful, charities that really do things no sensible commercial enterprise would ever consider will find themselves taxed just like services that can as easily be wrapped in a for profit or nonprofit jacket. We blur that distinction at our peril.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Calls for OSCR investigation into Kiltwalk running costs

5 Mar 2015

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator should open an investigation into Scottish fundraising event...

Legacy income rises 9.8 per cent, finds benchmark survey

2 Mar 2015

Like-for-like legacy income among large charities is up 9.8 per cent in the year to December 2014, according...

Diabetes UK raises £18.6m through Tesco partnership

27 Feb 2015

Tesco employees, suppliers and customers raised over £18m for Diabetes UK between March 2013 and December...

'Genuine risk' of terrorism in charities but problem overstated, says report

5 Mar 2015

There is a "genuine risk" of charities being used for terrorist purposes, but that risk has been exaggerated...

Eleven per cent of Charity Commission inquiries are opened into religious charities

5 Mar 2015

Twenty-three of the 201 statutory inquiries opened into charities in the year to March 2014 focused on...

Charity Commission releases new online annual returns form

5 Mar 2015

The Charity Commission has released its updated annual return, which includes new questions on the amount...

Daniel Phelan dies, aged 58

13 Feb 2015

Daniel Phelan, owner and editor-in-chief of Civil Society Media, passed away on Wednesday following a...

LinkedIn launches matching service to bring charity volunteering opportunities to 250,000 members

6 Feb 2015

Charities in the UK will be able to advertise volunteer opportunities to 250,000 LinkedIn members who...

Free guide to Bitcoin donations produced for charities

5 Feb 2015

Two Bitcoin organisations have launched a website and free guide to promote the use of the digital currency...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button