Share

CFG condemns Commission for lack of consultation on updated reserves guidance

CFG condemns Commission for lack of consultation on updated reserves  guidance
News

CFG condemns Commission for lack of consultation on updated reserves guidance 3

Finance | Alice Sharman | 29 Jan 2016

The Charity Commission has updated its trustee guidance on reserves, CC19, but the Charity Finance Group has objected to its failure to consult on it first and expressed concerns that it could make the sector less resilient.

The Commission is calling on trustees to “engage with and use” finance guidance from the regulator to run their charities effectively. It is to show that “trustees are ultimately responsible for their charities’ finances, and respond to the need to make sure its guidance reflects the most current challenges facing thousands of charities”.

The three sets of updated guidance are CC12 on Managing a charity’s finances: planning, managing difficulties and insolvency; CC19 on Charity reserves: building resilience; and its Charity governance, finance and resilience: 15 questions trustees should ask.

The CFG has criticised the updates for the “excessive emphasis placed on views of external stakeholders and unplanned closures” calling them “unhelpful”. It has also raised concerns over the risk that trustees will “misunderstand the role of reserves and not develop effective policies”.

It also said it was concerned that the guidance does not focus “on the need to build a reserves policy from a position of understanding of both the risks and opportunities facing a charity”, and that the guidance does not “emphasis the need for trustees to create a reserves policy based on a balance of needs for current and future beneficiaries”.

Update ‘unhelpful’

Caron Bradshaw, chief executive of the CFG, said that although she agrees with the Commission that trustees should think carefully about reserves and that the guidance should be refreshed, the updated guidance is “unhelpful”.

She said: “Trustees should decide on a reserves policy and target range based on the risks and opportunities facing their organisation as well as a balance between the current and future needs of beneficiaries. By focusing on the risk of unplanned closure, for example, the guidance does not encourage charities to take a holistic view of the needs of their charity.

“The reversal in position on reserves could have an unintended consequence of making the sector less resilient as charities focus on building more reserves and missing opportunities to grow and deliver their charitable objectives. There is also a danger that it could encourage charities to breach their duty to have the right level of reserves for their organisation in an effort to appease stakeholders.”

In response to criticism from the CFG, a Commission spokeswoman said: “We have shared our draft with CFG and are aware of their views through the helpful discussion we have had. We have clarified that we intend to review the guidance more generally later in the year.”

The CFG said it welcomes the full review and looks forward to improving the guidance in due course.

Updates a ‘knee-jerk reaction’

Kate Sayer, a partner at Sayer Vincent, said that the updated guidance is a “knee-jerk reaction” to the upcoming publication of the PACAC report into Kids Company, which will be released on Monday. She also criticised the lack of consultation.

She noted that the Commission has introduced a lot of references to unplanned closures, which she said is a “major change”. She said this may encourage trustees to calculate a reserves policy on the cost of redundancies and of closure, which is “not an appropriate way to think about reserves” as it is not a survival strategy for a charity. She referred to this as an “appalling way to communicate, and one that doesn’t make sense”.

She said this is because the definition of reserves and way of calculating them doesn’t reference occupied property, which would be of value again if a charity closed.

Sayer also said a consequence of the updated CC9 is that it encourages charities to keep large reserves, which won’t encourage donors who may believe that their donation is going to cover a charity’s cost of closure.

Changes to content

Changes to the guidance have included a focus on the role of a reserves policy in maintaining confidence of funders and external stakeholders, as well as the role of a reserves policy in avoiding unplanned closure of the charity. It also includes a change in emphasis from having to justify holding reserves towards being asked to justify not holding reserves.

The changes will mean that larger charities will be required to publish their assessment of the risks that the charity faces and how to manage them in their annual report. And that the reserves policy will need to reflect the risks of unplanned closure associated with the charity’s business model, spending commitments, potential liabilities and financial forecasts.

On unplanned closures, the Commission said that where a charity has to close, it expects trustees to have planned for an orderly shutdown. The guidance covers what is meant by insolvency, and what steps trustees should take if they believe they are insolvent, including getting good professional advice.  

The reserves guidance does confirm that there is no single level or even a range of reserves that is right for all charities. It says that any target set by trustees for the level of reserves to be held, or decision that there is no need for reserves, should reflect the particular circumstances of the individual charity. However “trustees should not simply monitor their level of reserves annually, but keep them under review throughout the year”.

Sarah Atkinson, director of policy and research at the Charity Commission, said: “We recognise that charities operate in a very challenging environment, with some charities heavily reliant on single sources of funding. So it is all the more important that trustees are in control of their charity’s finances. This means actively taking steps to manage their charity’s finances through regular monitoring, asking the right questions and getting professional help where needed. Donors and beneficiaries rightly ask questions about issues such as reserves, and want to understand why charities do or don’t have them. Reserves policies help tell that story clearly and demonstrate that trustees are aware of the real risks.

“These guidance updates are designed to help trustees make the right call and support them, not to overburden them. That’s why there are also guides on how to set a good reserves policy for small and large charities. As regulator there is a limit on how much we can do as these are individual decisions for trustees to make. But these tools will help them manage any difficulties properly and with confidence.”

 

Andrew O'Brien
Head of Policy & Engagement
Charity Finance Group
2 Feb 2016

CFG have been consistently transparent regarding our reserves policy and use of reserves (internally and in our annual reports). Feel free to read our annual reports for more information.

CFG used its reserves to bring about significant change in our operatons and to safeguard against future risk. An approach that put CFG beneficiaries at heart. So successful was approach that we have been able to replenish our reserves (to within target range) within 1 year and not the three years planned.

Change involves risk and opens you to criticism. We must not have a sector which avoids making changes, because there are risks, or holds the wrong level of reserves for their charity as a result of, for example, being unduly swayed by fears of what funders might think.

The concerns that our Chief Executive have highlighted about CC19 are not only valid but essential to ensuring that the sector takes into account the right factors when determining their reserves policies.

We look forward to working with the Commission to improve this importance piece of guidance

You can read Civil Society's previous story on our reserves here: http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/20541/charity_finance_group_triples_it_reserves_in_a_year

You can also read our annual report here: http://www.cfg.org.uk/about-us/~/media/Files/About%20Us/05_annual%20reports/CFGAnnualReport2015print.pdf

Paul Bartlett
Accountant
Accountant
2 Feb 2016
Response to [Andrew O'Brien]

Good 'political' answer Andrew but you are ducking the issue.

I have had a look at the annual report for 2013/4 and on page 19/20 CFG states that an informed decision was made during the financial year to invest more in a restructure and office move and that the drop in reserves was planned.

However Civil Society Media reported that the CFG trustees had no idea that their reserves had plunged by nearly three-quarters until two months after the end of this financial year. So how could they plan for something that they did not even know was happening?

Civil Society Media goes on to allege that the reason for this collapse in reserves was that errors had been identified in the way the organisation had been accounting for membership income, VAT and certain expenditure, and additional unbudgeted expense had been incurred on the office move and consultancy costs.

I cannot see anywhere where these allegations have been denied by CFG.

So it looks like a simple case of really poor financial mismanagement followed by a cover up.

The CEO, Caron Bradshaw and Chair, Ian Theodoreson are still in post and CFG feels qualified to comment on reserve policies? Come off it Andrew.

For the membership body of Charity Finance Professionals
to have acted in this way is dreadful. And for so many high profile Finance Directors to have been trustees of the organisation at this time and let his happen – very ugly.

Paul Bartlett
Accountant
Accountant
1 Feb 2016

I thought the pantomime season had finished for now - and then I read this.

CFG Caron Bradshaw advising on reserves.

Is this the same Caron who was CEO at CFG when Civil Society Media reported that they were in the dark about their own reserves drop?

How many organisations can be less qualified to comment on reserves than CFG? Kids Company maybe?

http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/18454/cfg_board_was_in_the_dark_about_reserves_drop

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Cancer Research UK's Race for Life tops list of mass particpation fundraising events

22 Jul 2016

Cancer Research’s Race for Life raised £52.8m last year making it the highest-earning mass participation...

Fundraising Regulator levy proposals ‘unfair’ on smaller organisations, say stakeholders

22 Jul 2016

Representatives of small and medium charities have said that the proposed levy disproportionately affects...

Big Lottery spending down more than £300m after large project delayed

20 Jul 2016

Big Lottery Fund grant-giving fell from over £900m to just under £600m in the year to March 2016, after...

NCVO launches the next stage of its programme to improve trust and confidence in charities

22 Jul 2016

NCVO is to launch a website explaining how charities work along with a communications toolkit for charities...

Bubb launches Charity Futures Programme

21 Jul 2016

Sir Stephen Bubb officially launched the Charity Futures Programme at an event at the Houses of Parliament...

Charity Commission opens inquiry into poverty relief organisation

21 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a UK-based poverty relief charity that “does not appear...

Blockchain technology could ‘revolutionise’ charity regulation, says report

21 Jul 2016

Blockchain technology could eventually be used to carry out many of the functions of a traditional regulator,...

Macmillan, Cancer Research UK and Brooke use Pokemon Go to encourage fundraising

14 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support, Cancer Research UK and Brooke are among the charities to encourage fundraising...

Stop looking for a 'big bang' moment for digital transformation

4 Jul 2016

Charities should stop looking for a “big bang” moment in digital transformation and instead focus...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance