Share

Charities' record on reserves policy is improving

Charities' record on reserves policy is improving
News

Charities' record on reserves policy is improving2

Governance | Tania Mason | 19 Oct 2012

A Charity Commission analysis of 286 trustees’ annual reports has revealed that almost four in five charities now have a reserves policy – a marked improvement on a similar survey conducted in 2006, when only two in five charities had one.

The recent review examined the trustees’ annual reports of around 95 charities in each of three income brackets - £25,000 to £250,000; £250,000 to £500,000, and over £500,000. It found that 78 per cent contained a reserves policy statement, and a further 3 per cent stated that the trustees have no reserves policy.

However, larger charities were much more likely to include a reserves policy statement – 91 per cent of the organisations in the top income bracket did have one, compared with 59 per cent of the smaller charities. This is despite evidence that smaller charities hold proportionately more reserves than big ones – the average reserves-to-income ratio of the smallest income was 3.49:1, while the largest charities’ average ratio was 0.42:1.

According to the Charity Commission, some charities also overstate their reserves. In the report accompanying the findings, the regulator stated: “This doesn’t appear to be intentional but rather due to a lack of understanding around the definition of reserves, as the figure quoted is often the same as the total funds figure from the balance sheet.” However, where charities have designated funds, the quality of reporting improves.

More to be done to ensure compliance

Despite the improvement in compliance compared with six years ago, the Commission said the sector still has a way to go to abide fully by the law, as all registered charities apart from exempt or excepted ones are legally required to either include a reserves policy on their trustees’ annual report, or state that they don’t have one.

“The research also shows there is still a lot more finance managers and trustees can do to improve how they present the charity’s reserves policy in the report. It is not enough just to simply say they have one,” the Commission said.

It is important that charities have a reserves policy and publicly explain it, according to the Commission, because charity law requires any income received by a charity to be spent within a reasonable period. “Therefore trustees need to be able to justify the level of reserves they hold and be transparent and accountable about their approach to their stakeholders.

“Another reason is that a good policy gives confidence that the charity is managing its finances well and planning its future funding needs, which may be of interest to potential donors.”

RedTabby21
19 Oct 2012

Unfortunately, my small charity has reserves of over 4 million which would not be so bad if our charity was state of the art. Unfortunately the buildings are in a sorry state of repair, and our Board of Trustees will not release the money as they are afraid of literally running out. I wish there was a separate body that could look into the state of small charities that are often linked to a larger charity to stop this mis management of funds by amateurs who call themselves Trustees.

Anon
Trustee
22 Oct 2012
Response to [RedTabby21]

If you believe that the charity is mis-managing its reserves then you can raise that with the Charity Commission who will advise whether they think there is a case to answer and can require the Trustees to justify the policy.

However, as a Trustee, holding reserves is a difficult topic to get right particularly at a time when funding is uncertain. Trustees need to balance spending money that the charity already has on its core purposes against holding a reasonable amount in reserve in case of a sudden funding drop.

It would be reckless to spend everything that the charity has and then be unable to pay staff one month for example because of a funding problem.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Shadow minister wades in to Big Society Network funding controversy

22 May 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...

National abuse charity told it will not receive Jimmy Savile Trust funds

22 May 2013

The trustees of the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are not donating any funds to the National Association...

Commission moots indicating FRSB membership on charity register

22 May 2013

Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...

Big Society Network's 2012 accounts show £180k deficit

23 May 2013

Big Society Network has finally filed its 2012 accounts with Companies House, nearly five months late,...

New CRB body to launch 'time-saving' checking process in June

23 May 2013

The Disclosure and Barring Service, which has replaced CRB checks, has announced details of its new Update...

Help for Heroes offers condolences to murdered soldier's family

23 May 2013

Help for Heroes has expressed its “deep sadness” about the murder of a soldier in south London who...

Age UK and London Zoo on shortlist for £2m Google charity competition

22 May 2013

Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Sector needs a 'data manifesto', says leadership review

17 May 2013

The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance