Share

Banking reforms put charities at further risk, warn sector leaders

Jane Tully, head of policy, CFG
News

Banking reforms put charities at further risk, warn sector leaders

Finance | Niki May Young | 15 Oct 2012

The draft banking reform Bill, which has dismissed the need to protect charities' deposits in the event of banking collapses, has been slammed by charity sector leaders, who warn the proposals could put charities at further risk of going under.

The Independent Commission on Banking, which published the Bill on Friday, said that after considering the need to create a preferred protection for deposits from organisations such as charities and local authorities, "the government deemed that there was not a sufficiently strong case for preferring any of these debts alongside insured deposits", and therefore only insured deposits will be protected. 

Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of Acevo warned that "charities risk losing everything if their bank goes under, putting services for the vulnerable at risk".

He continued: "Over recent years we have seen the devastating impacts on beneficiaries and communities of charity closures caused by the financial crisis. The government urgently needs to think again and give charities preferred creditor status, at no cost to the taxpayer, before its inaction sends yet more charities out of business."

Charities' case is not exceptional

In its Bill, the Committee defends its decision not to give charities preferred creditor status: "There are considerable drawbacks in extending the scope of preference to other groups of creditors, such as the dilution of the benefits of preference to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), and the effect of increasing the exposure of other non-preferred groups to losses in the event the bank fails," it said.

"The wider the extension of preference (for example to multiple groups), the greater the impact of these drawbacks will be. The government has carefully considered the arguments made in favour of preferring other groups of depositors, but takes the view that no group or sector stands out as an exceptional case." 

It continues that: "Organisations that channel public or donor funds to deliver societal benefits include, among others, schools, universities, charities, police authorities, and local authorities, and the larger ones will be more likely to have the resources to make multimillion pound  investments on the basis of maximising return for a given level of risk (rather than purely holding funds prior to onward transfer). Such organisations are likely to be at least as well positioned to monitor and manage risk as many other groups of senior unsecured creditors who would stand to be subordinated if preference were extended."

Charity Finance Group (CFG) welcomed an additional degree of protection offered by the Bill in the form of an extension of the FSCS to cover all individuals and most organisations up to the coverage limit of £85,000, but Jane Tully, head of policy at CFG said that for large charities this would be "a drop in the ocean". 

Speaking of the Bill overall, Tully said the government has "missed an opportunity" to provide greater protection to charities. She advised that the failure to do so could mean that charities are could be forced to reduce income by depositing in banks with lower returns, or increase spending by paying advice or training in managing risk.

"Charities will therefore need to be aware of the changes, and ensure that they have the skills and capacity to effectively manage this increased banking risk," said Tully.

CFG had outlined these risks in a joint response with NCVO, Acevo and CAF to the White Paper consultation, which launched in June. 

Next steps

The Bill is now to be scrutinised by the Commission on Banking Standards prior to its formal introduction in Parliament. Government has advised of its commitment to see the Bill enacted in legislation within its term of leadership (by 2015) and come into force by 2019.

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Breast Cancer Campaign breached IoF Code of Practice over fundraising call, FRSB rules

29 May 2015

A phone call made on behalf of Breast Cancer Campaign twice breached the Code of Fundraising Practice,...

Grayling: government will act to stop ‘gross exploitation’ of elderly people following Olive Cooke case

29 May 2015

The government will "bring forward measures to address issues in the charity sector" following the death...

Dispatches considers second investigation into charity fundraisers

28 May 2015

Channel 4 current affairs programme Dispatches is considering another investigation into fundraising,...

Big Society Capital chief executive to step down by end of year

29 May 2015

Nick O’Donohoe, the chief executive of Big Society Capital, has today announced that he will be leaving...

Commission: 'serious concerns' about charity asking sex crime director to reconsider resignation

29 May 2015

The Charity Commission has said it would have "serious regulatory concerns" if an aid charity presses...

National Trust for Scotland appoints new chief executive

29 May 2015

The National Trust for Scotland has announced that Simon Skinner has been appointed as its new chief executive....

Charity chief executives and trustees 'lack leadership' on digital technology, says report

28 May 2015

A "lack of brave leadership" is holding the sector back from exploiting digital technologies, according...

One-fifth of charities surveyed do not accept donations through their own websites

27 May 2015

Some 20 per cent of charities do not accept donations via their own websites, and 38 per cent are not...

Children's Society and NSPCC to improve their digital services

26 May 2015

The Children's Society and NSPCC both said last week they plan to revamp digital services for young people,...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance