Allegation of bias as Church disinvests from News Corp

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 14 Aug 2012

The former chairman of the Church of England newspaper has criticised The Independent co-founder Andreas Whittam Smith's role in the Church's decision to sell its £1.9m shareholding in News Corp, suggesting he had a conflict of interest.

Last week, the Church sold its £1.9m shareholding in News Corp over concerns about the governance of the media organisation.

But Robert Leach, former chairman of the Church of England newspaper (pictured, right), has said Andreas Whittam Smith, director of Independent Print Ltd, publisher of The Independent and chairman of the Church Commissioners' asset committee, should not have been part of the decision to disinvest from News Corp.

He told civilsociety.co.uk: "Andreas Whittam Smith is the director of a rival to News Corp and has publicly critcised the organisation, so it would have been better if he played no part in the decision to disinvest. It is important that the decision is seen to be fair."

But a Church of England spokesman responded: "We don't accept the way that the asset committee reached its decision somehow contravened Charity Commission guidelines.

"We all, including all Church Commissioners, have different roles and different interests, which those guidelines help us to manage when there is a particular conflict.

"But the rule does not bar anyone with any possible interest from taking part in the organisation's business. And in this particular instance, Andreas Whittam Smith had no real or pecuniary interest we can detect."

Whittam Smith has written a number of opinion pieces for The Independent criticising people and companies associated with News Corp, including News of the World and Rupert Murdoch.

Directory: Church Commissioners for England

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.