Share

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

King Edward VII and Queen Mary School, Lancashire
News

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

Governance | Tania Mason | 24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in Lancashire to merge, but directed the regulator to amend the scheme underpinning the merger so that the school cannot profit by using the premises for anything other than educating local children.

The Commission decided last November to allow the merger of the Arnold School in Blackpool, which is run by the United Church Schools Trust (USCT), with the King Edward VII and Queen Mary School (KEQMS) in nearby Lytham.  The decision came in spite of around 100 objections from local campaigners calling themselves Friends of KEQMS Lytham.

The campaigners had claimed that negotiations about the merger were conducted in secrecy and there was no consultation with pupils, parents or staff. They billed the merger as a “takeover by the United Church Schools Trust” and warned that if the merger were permitted to proceed, pupils with special learning needs would not be adequately catered for, and that the new arrangement would not require Christian education.

After the Commission agreed to the merger, the Friends of KEQMS Lytham, represented by Raymond Aliss and Martin Hesketh, challenged the decision at the Charity Tribunal.

In its ruling published last week, the Tribunal rejected the campaigners’ argument that the two schools were so different that they should never have been allowed to merge. It also said their concern at the way in which the merger was announced and pursued was understandable, but not really relevant to the case.

The Tribunal decided that the property of the Lytham schools could be used more effectively to provide public benefit if the schools were combined, but also accepted that the existing terms of the lease creates a conflict of interest with the objects of the charity.

“For example, the premises of the KEQMS could be used for purposes other than the provision of a school that will benefit local residents and UCST could be in a position to gain a financial advantage from some changes of use,” the judges said.

“The Tribunal concludes that a modified scheme could provide more effectively for the charity property to be used for the public benefit in providing education in or near Lytham St. Annes.”

All parties to the case were given two weeks – until 31 May - to write to the Tribunal suggesting revisions to the scheme.

In response, a Charity Commission spokeswoman said: "We recognise that the Tribunal has upheld our decision subject to certain proposed amendments to the scheme. We will be looking at how this judgment can help inform our future work. "

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charities should be 'critical friends' to their corporate partners

17 Sep 2014

Charities should approach corporate partnerships as “critical friends” if they are going to change...

Teenage Cancer Trust reveals £5m Stephen Sutton legacy

16 Sep 2014

Teenage Cancer Trust has announced it intends to spend the £5m raised by Stephen Sutton to fund new specialist...

Man jailed for stealing £300,000 of donations meant for Help for Heroes

16 Sep 2014

A man has been jailed for four and a half years for stealing £300,000 donated by the public who believed...

Shawcross: 'Too often charities respond defensively'

17 Sep 2014

Sector leaders warned yesterday that charities need to get better at answering the public’s questions...

Governance code 'no longer fit' for large charities, says CFG trustee

17 Sep 2014

The sector’s code of good governance is no longer fit for purpose for large and complex charities and...

BHF implements changes following invoice fraud

17 Sep 2014

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) has said it will implement tighter controls to prevent future cases...

JustGiving page for Manchester Dogs’ Home receives four donations a second

15 Sep 2014

JustGiving has said that donations going to an appeal for the Manchester Dogs’ Home following an arson...

Commission's new online charity search to launch soon after delay

15 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission’s searchable online register of charities is due to launch in beta this autumn,...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance