Share

National Audit Office suggests survey of Work Programme subcontractors

National Audit Office suggests survey of Work Programme subcontractors
News

National Audit Office suggests survey of Work Programme subcontractors

Finance | Tania Mason | 24 Jan 2012

The Department for Work and Pensions should look at surveying subcontractors on the Work Programme to be assured that adequate standards of management by prime contractors are being met.

This recommendation is one of several from the National Audit Office regarding the Work Programme, contained in the NAO’s report examining the first year of the Programme.

The NAO also recommends the DWP should carry out “spot checks” to ensure primes are treating their subcontractors fairly, as “early indications show that subcontractors are dissatisfied with the approach taken by some prime contractors”.

And it advises DWP to have clear steps in place for what it should do if a provider gets into “serious financial difficulty” during the term of the contract, as this looks possible.

The NAO used the report to chastise the Department for not sharing with bidders the assumptions and underlying data it used to arrive at its business plan for the Programme, and said that in future it should do so.  There is a “significant risk”, the NAO added, that these assumptions are “over-optimistic”.

DWP should also keenly monitor whether its existing management regime is effectively detecting any attempts by contractors to improve their performance by selectively focusing on those beneficiaries that are easiest to help, and leaving harder-to-help claimants for their subcontractors.

“Currently many fewer harder-to-help claimants than expected have been referred to prime contracts,” the NAO said. “As a consequence, some subcontractors are frustrated at the speed with which claimants have been referred to them.”

Shortcuts in risk management

The speedy introduction of the Programme – one year, as against four years for previous welfare-to-work programmes – was a “significant administrative achievement”, the NAO conceded, but also meant shortcuts were taken in risk reduction.

Also, the IT project to support the Programme was not up and running when the Work Programme was launched, leading to heightened risk of fraud and error, and DWP had to pay large sums to terminate existing welfare-to-work contracts early. Compensation payments totalling £63m have already been agreed with a further two settlements to come.

“Overall, the speed with which the Work Programme has been introduced has involved the acceptance of risks, or curtailing of safeguards, that potentially will have a bearing on the Programme’s success or failure.

“These include incurring charges for terminating previous schemes early; compiling the business case after the decision had been made to proceed; the absence of piloting; the rapid procurement phase; and going live before IT was in place.”

Responses

Margaret Hodge MP, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said in response: “Referrals to sub-contractors are already lower than projected by the Department and this may have a devastating impact on small charities providing specialist support…we will want assurance that the Department has oversight of its prime contractors and that sub-contractors are not squeezed out of business.”

Gareth Thomas MP, Labour’s shadow minister for civil society, said: “The Work Programme was billed as the great solution to the funding crisis facing charities and community groups as ministers promised 40 per cent of referrals would go to voluntary sector organisations. Instead less than half of this level has materialised; yet another sign that the Big Society rhetoric hasn’t delivered.

“The revelation that terminating existing welfare to work contracts cost the taxpayer £63m is particularly shocking when so many charities and voluntary groups are struggling to keep their heads above water.”

Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of NCVO, said the recommendations for monitoring performance assumptions both for this and future initiatives are “particularly timely given the disappointing value and number of contracts which have gone to voluntary sector subcontractors”.

He added: “The report’s recommendations, if implemented by government, should go some way towards ironing out current issues in the Work Programme and help to raise the bar for future schemes.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Charities who ignore 'no cold callers' signs are not in breach of Iof Code of Practice, says FRSB

29 Jan 2015

Doorstep fundraisers can ignore “no cold callers” signs without breaching the Code of Fundraising...

Macmillan Coffee Morning raises record breaking £25m

29 Jan 2015

Macmillan’s flagship fundraising event, the World's Biggest Coffee Morning, has beaten its previous...

BP donations to Tate 'embarrassingly small' say campaigners

27 Jan 2015

An arts charity has criticised the Tate for accepting an “embarrassingly small” amount of money from...

Shawcross reappointed as chair of the Charity Commission

29 Jan 2015

Francis Maude, minister for the Cabinet Office, has reappointed William Shawcross as chair of Charity...

Commission shows ‘real improvement’ but many concerns remain, says Public Accounts Committee

29 Jan 2015

The Charity Commission has been praised by Margaret Hodge, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, for...

Commission to investigate charitable school over private benefit from leisure centre and dating agency

29 Jan 2015

The Charity Commission is set to open a statutory inquiry into Durand Education Trust, a charity connected...

NGO domain pages will launch in May

28 Jan 2015

The Public Interest Registry will make the .ngo generic top-level domain name generally available from...

Comparison website for special needs services launched by charity consortium

23 Jan 2015

A coalition of social care charities has launched a TripAdvisor-style website, designed to help families...

CRUK debuts contactless giving through shop windows

21 Jan 2015

Cancer Research UK has announced a collaboration with outdoor media owner Clear Channel to bring contactless...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance