Church Commissioners voice concerns to Murdoch on News Corp share1

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 1 Nov 2011

The Church Commissioners have written to Rupert Murdoch for the second time this year to express concerns about News Corporation, in which it has an investment of £3.8m.

The letter follows a failed motion by shareholders to elect an independent chairman in place of Rupert Murdoch, who also holds the position of CEO.

Last month, at the News Corporation annual general meeting, the Church Commissioners' Ethical Investment Advisory Group (EIAG) supported a motion from fellow shareholders the Christian Brothers Investment Fund, which asked for the role of chairman and CEO to be split.

The motion was a reaction to this summer’s phone-hacking scandal at News Corporation paper News of the World, which shut down in July at Murdoch’s order.

A member of the EIAG travelled to Los Angeles to speak in support of the motion. However, it was rejected by the majority of shareholders.

A Church Commissioners spokesman would not comment on the contents of the EIAG’s letter to Murdoch. But he told civilsociety.co.uk that the motion failed to go through as 40 per cent of News Corporation is owned by family members, and the other 12 per cent is held by a friend of the Murdochs.

It is the second time this year that the EIAG has written to Murdoch with concerns following the phone-hacking scandal.

In July, the EIAG wrote a letter threatening to withdraw its £3.8m holding unless he held senior executives to account for the actions of News of the World.

Professor Richard Burridge, deputy chairman of the ethical investment committee, said: "If we don't get a satisfactory answer then disinvestment comes on to the horizon, but you can't go straight to the nuclear option, you have to engage first."

May engage with internet providers over pornography

Elsewhere, the Church Commissioners have said claims by the Daily Mail that the charity is considering withdrawing its investments in Internet Service Providers (ISPs) over the rise of internet porn, is incorrect.

A spokesman told civilsociety.co.uk that the Church’s EIAG was simply reviewing its investment policy, including investments that may indirectly promote pornography:

“Last July, the EIAG decided to review its investment policy. This included investment in porn in light of the internet. It is reviewing the position of ISPs. If we think there is an issue we will engage with them on this.

"Only as a last resort will we disinvest."

Directory: Church Commissioners for England

Place a comment

Robin Macfarlane
Founder
British Senior Citizens Party.
1 Nov 2011

Can you pls give me some feedback ref. phone-hacking and News of World owners. I am aware that the newspaper overstepped the mark by getting involved with private people, which I do not condon in any way. But in the operation of investigating other institutions,Gov's and Companies the Press seems to do a good job of informing the people of bad practices.Such as the MP's Expenses. The Gov's secret services are involved in phone-hacking without any accountability to the public.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.