Council slams use of £4m charity pot to fund superfast broadband

Council slams use of £4m charity pot to fund superfast broadband

Council slams use of £4m charity pot to fund superfast broadband5

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 22 Sep 2011

Cambridge City Council has criticised Cambridgeshire County Council for planning to divert around £4m of government money originally earmarked for the voluntary sector to fund super-fast broadband, without consulting charities in the area first.

The £4m in funds is from the government’s Local Public Service Agreement (LPSA) with Cambridgeshire County Council.

A first tranche of £4.5m of funds from the LPSA went on a variety of social projects in Cambridgeshire, with much of the funds going to the voluntary sector.

However, a second tranche of £4.5m was initially cancelled last summer by the coalition government. However, Cambridgeshire managed to claw back the funds from government after a campaign from local councils in the area.

But now, Cambridge City Council has condemned the County Council’s plans to use £4m of the funds on a superfast broadband project, leaving £500,000 for social projects, without consulting the voluntary sector.

The leader of Cambridge City Council, Sian Reid, told “The voluntary sector is experiencing great difficulty with an increase in demand for their services, a decline in income from investment and donations, and the threat of cuts in public funding. And I have said that this decision should not be made without consulting the voluntary sector and others in our local strategic partnership. This money was earned in partnership and should be spent in partnership.”

She added that the decision had been taken so the County Council could reduce its borrowing charges on broadband.

“Faster broadband will happen anyway. The funding won’t make a difference, but it will reduce the County Council’s borrowing for the project.”

Broadband will 'do the most good'

However, Cambridgeshire County Councillor Ian Bates, cabinet member for growth and planning, said better broadband would bring business to the area - leading to a better quality of life and less strain on the voluntary sector:

"I am pleased that the majority of councils and public bodies across Cambridgeshire could come together and find a way to spend this money that will do the most good for all our communities," he said. "It is what residents expect of their councils.

"Better broadband is vital for Cambridgeshire. It brings business, jobs and therefore opportunities and better quality of living. In turn this means less strain on our support services and charities freeing up their resources to deal with the most needy."

A Cambridgeshire County Council spokesman said the move was supported by district council leaders from Huntingdonshire, Fenland, East Cambridgeshire and South Cambridgeshire, as well as the Cambridgeshire Constabulary and Cambridgeshire NHS.

He added: “Unfortunately, many of the projects the £4.5m had been earmarked for had either been stopped or not even started, making it difficult to share out the rest.”

Cambridgeshire County Council Cabinet is expected to vote on the plans next week.


Richard Molineux
molineux fundraising
27 Sep 2011

Lots of people outside the larger cities have no access to the sort of broadband speed that the urban lot take for granted. This means small businesses cannot compete properly, any amount of interesting stuff takes for ever to be downloaded, and entire areas of the country are cut off from what is now regarded as normal life by all classes of society. It is deeply luddite and wierdly bigotted to portray the countryside as inhabited only by the very rich. I love the idea that the people of Cambridge city are all moderate lib dems and a few other "good" odds and sods, who deserve proper connectivity and the countryside is full of the super-rich who don't deserve it. The really rich have work-arounds anyway.

Stephen Lulsley
Independent Commentator and Consultant
26 Sep 2011

Conservative government, Conservative council. QED!

Jeff Mowatt
People-Centered Economic Development
25 Sep 2011

Last year the Forest of Dean acquired £160k funding from RDPE for a broadband task group and as director of a social enterprise advocating a 'community interest' approach, I'd been invited to participate and accepted on a voluntary basis.

That invitation was soon revoked with the appointment of a cabinet member for economic development to lead the group. With community driven options excluded the task group proceeded to conclude that upgraes to BT equipment were the way forward. We never found out how the money was spent.

When it comes to government ideals of Big Society and social enterprise, there's a clear division betwewn that which is supported by public funding, for example the NHS and that which has commercial potential and more importantly, potential to fund social innovation.

Clearly we represent a threat to vested commercial interests and perhaps the greatest tragedy is that could by now have been generating large scale investment for community development.

22 Sep 2011

Did you mean the Tory voting travellers who have over-run Cottenham or the Tory voting migrant workers in the Cambridgeshire fens?

22 Sep 2011

This is British politics in microcosm - the moderate people of the city of Cambridge consistently vote Lib Dem, with a bit of Labour & Green - but the super-rich 'country folk' living in massive houses, on huge plots of land in pretty little thatched-roof villages on the outskirts of Cambridge vote Tory.

So, with a nod and a wink, the Tory government give £4.5m of central tax-payers money to a Tory County Council - and they spend it on making sure rich people living in big houses in the country get superfast broadband, and the poor and the vulnerable, the children & the elderly, the disabled and the homeless of Cambridge, get shafted.

This is essentially what happens in the whole of the UK.

Don't believe the spin; the Tories haven't changed - they are still the nasty party.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Oxfam GB appoints new director to grow major donor fundraising

22 May 2015

Oxfam GB has appointed a new director in a bid to grow income from what it called “high value” partnerships....

DEC appeal raises £65m in under a month for Nepal quake

22 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee’s Nepal Earthquake Appeal has raised £65m since it opened for donations...

Olive Cooke investigation ‘likely to lead to tighter rules on direct mail and telephone fundraising’

21 May 2015

The Fundraising Standards Board will investigate how charities share lists of donors and whether opt-out...

Think carefully before changing your name, says free guide to rebranding

22 May 2015

Charities considering changing their name must first find out exactly what their staff, beneficiaries...

Homeless shelter investigated over ‘significant private benefit’ payments

22 May 2015

The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into a Bristol-based shelter after concerns were...

Clic Sargent chief executive to retire at the end of the year

21 May 2015

Clic Sargent chief executive Lorraine Clifton, has announced that she will retire at the end of the year...

Marie Curie grows visitor time and donor numbers online by a quarter after digital relaunch

22 May 2015

Marie Curie set out to improve its use of digital after realising that it was “limiting its future”...

Amnesty trials virtual reality headsets for street fundraisers

21 May 2015

Amnesty International UK has given street fundraisers virtual reality headsets so they can show the public...

Review programme launched to help charity sector embrace digital technology

20 May 2015

A review programme has been launched by think tank NPC to assess how to improve access to digital technology...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button