28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one
23 May 2012
The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...
Entering consortia helps charities to access additional funding and to build their capacity through peer support and sharing of resources, a Charity Commission study has found.
Consortia for the delivery of public services: the issues for small and medium-sized charities, which looked at the experiences of charities in five consortia of varying sizes, heard that their involvement helped organisations to cost their services properly and operate in a more businesslike way.
As one participant said: “If you’re a smaller organisation, you don’t have an HR department and it’s a massive help to be able to call someone to check that you’re doing things in the right way and to provide you with support.”
Charities also revealed that mission incompatibility had not been a concern, as overall, those in the consortia found they had broadly similar aims.
However, charities were not always fully considering the risks of joining consortia, with a tendency to not carry out any due diligence.
This was often because they felt they already knew the other organisations and had already worked together, or because they were happy to rely on the commissioning body to do this.
The report also contains the news revealed by Dame Suzi Leather earlier this month that some organisations are not consulting their trustee boards before taking the decision to join consortia.
Speaking about the findings, Commission chief executive Sam Younger said: “This research demonstrates that working together in consortia is a really effective way for charities to access more funding sources than they can on their own. However, it is surprising that decisions to join consortia in some cases are not being taken by trustees.
“While everyone hopes nothing will go wrong, there are more steps charities should take to protect themselves from any potential pitfalls”
The five consortia studied in the report were: the Birmingham Disability Consortium; Rotherham Children, Young People and Families Consortium; Northumberland Learning and Employability Access Partnership; Sheffield Well-being Consortium; and the 800 Group.
Tina Steele
Payroll Giving Consultant - Retired
19 Jul 2011
As part of the Payroll Giving SME Grant Programme we funded a series of workshops designed to provide information for charities thinking about setting up a consortium for fundraising, specifically Payroll Giving. A model has been developed for a local charity consortium which benefits the local community and a copy of the workbook is still available.
23 May 2012
The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...
23 May 2012
A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...
23 May 2012
New research released by nfpSynergy claims that almost half the British public think that voluntary sector...
23 May 2012
A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...
23 May 2012
Charity insurance specialist Ecclesiastical has published a risk guide for charities which are undertaking...
23 May 2012
The Disasters Emergency Committee has appointed Saleh Saeed as chief executive to take over when current...
21 May 2012
Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...
21 May 2012
Conversion rates are the biggest concern for nearly half of all email marketers surveyed by the Direct...
16 May 2012
Samsung has launched the Hope Relay mobile app to raise money for three charities including Kids Company,...
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
15 Oct 2012
19 Nov 2012
Mike Cox
Head of Bid Management
LSN
20 Jul 2011
LSN have done some of our 'best' work with consortia that include specialist charities. Our problem is that we sometimes struggle to get to the right person in the charity in time to respond effectively to a request for work. Or the charity does not have the capacity to support our response effectively, but would be great at helping deliver its outcomes.
[Reply]