Share

Action for Kids angry at Commission's sanction of NCH rebrand

Action for Kids angry at Commission's sanction of NCH rebrand
News

Action for Kids angry at Commission's sanction of NCH rebrand 1

Finance | Vibeka Mair | 17 Sep 2008

National disability charity Action for Kids has vowed to challenge the Charity Commission’s decision to allow NCH to change its name to Action for Children if it sees any evidence of public confusion.

Tomorrow, NCH will officially relaunch as Action for Children as part of its Change for Children programme, which aims to effectively reflect and deliver its work supporting vulnerable children, young people and their families.

The news has upset Action for Kids (pictured), along with West London Action for Children, Action for Sick Children, Action for Children’s Art and the Association for the Welfare of Children in Hospital who had banded together to urge the Charity Commission to prevent the name change.

‘Document any confusion’

Chief executive of Action for Kids Mike Hayes has promised to continue to monitor and document any confusion caused after the launch of the new name and communicate this to the Charity Commission as appropriate.

In evidence to the Commission this month, all the charities complained that the name change would cause confusion.

Action for Kids said there was a risk of an administrative burden if it received post, phone calls or legacies intended for Action for Children. The charity recalled when NCH was known as NCH Action for Children in the 1990s and it received correspondence in error.

Smaller charities to lose identities

Smaller charities West London Action for Children, Action for Sick Children and Action for Children’s Art complained that they could lose their identities as a result of the name change.

However, although the Charity Commission admitted that there was a risk of public confusion as a result of the name change, it felt that NCH’s evidence clearly demonstrated that the charity would operate much more effectively as Action for Children.

NCH told the Commission that its name did not reflect the charity’s values or accurately describe what it did and this had a detrimental affect on its fundraising performance. NCH felt that ‘Action for Children’ provided a stronger connection to the identity, values and activities of the charity and would boost the brand.

The Charity Commission agreed that the name change was necessary in the interest of NCH’s beneficiaries, and that there was no “material risk” of public confusion with other charities.

Confusion ‘from the past’

“The evidence of public confusion was from the past,” said the Commission. “Today the public are more likely to access information via the internet whereas in the 1990s other sources of information such as telephone directories would have been relied upon. Accessing information about a charity via the internet means not only that branding is more visible but also that more information can be given at the time of making a donation or accessing information.”

Action for Kids chief executive Mike Hayes said he was disappointed with the decision: “The potential confusion and administrative burden which may be imposed on Action for Kids as a result of the name change is huge. Charities that have similar names and causes may well have their profile swamped.”

The Charity Commission has said Action for Children needs to clearly explain charities with similar names are separate entities from it and not connected to it, to mitigate any risk of confusion.

Marian Nicholson
Director
Herpes Viruses Association
17 Sep 2008

The Charity Commission is being naive to expect the new Action for Children to "explain ...[the others] are separate entities" as this is NOT in the interest of the new charity.

It is a distressing result for all the 'Action for Children" charities which will inevitably be assumed to be part of the ex-NCH.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close ยป

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

28 codes of fundraising practice to be condensed into one

23 May 2012

The Institute of Fundraising is to replace its 28 codes of fundraising practice with a single code and...

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

BIS consultation on volunteer-led events criticised

24 May 2012

A consultation launched by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has been criticised for...

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Royal Shakespeare Company collaborates with war veterans charity

23 May 2012

A theatre company run by war veterans charity Stoll has partnered with the Royal Shakespeare Company Open...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Marie Curie opens national support centre and adds 140 staff

21 May 2012

Marie Curie Cancer Care has officially opened its new national support centre in Pontypool, Wales, creating...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance