Share

‘Draconian’ new clause in government grant agreements bans charities from lobbying

‘Draconian’ new clause in government grant agreements bans charities from lobbying
News

‘Draconian’ new clause in government grant agreements bans charities from lobbying4

Finance | Alice Sharman | 8 Feb 2016

The Cabinet Office has announced a new clause in grant agreements which will ban charities and other organisations from using government grants to lobby government and Parliament.

Matt Hancock, minister for the Cabinet Office, announced a new clause on Saturday which has been inserted into all new and renewed agreements.

But the clause has been widely condemned by charity representatives, with Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of NCVO, saying it was a "draconian move" and "tantamount to making charities take a vow of silence", and shadow minister for civil society Anna Turley saying it was "an outrageous attempt" to prevent charities criticising government when its policies failed their beneficiaries.

Hancock said the clause was intended to stop government using its own money to pay charities to lobby for unpopular policies, but charities have repeatedly said there are almost no proven examples of this taking place.

Hancock said the new clause will “make sure that taxpayer funds are spent on improving people’s lives and good causes, rather than lobbying for new regulation or using taxpayers’ money to lobby for more government funding.”

He said the clause will not prevent organisations from using their own privately-raised funds to “campaign as they see fit” and that the new rules were “successfully piloted” by the Department for Communities and Local Government last year.

“These common sense rules will protect freedom of speech," he said.

Sector calls for government to reconsider

Anna Turley, shadow minister for civil society, said the announcement was "an outrageous attempt to further curb the independence of charities and restrict their ability to speak out on issues of failing government policy".

"It has not even been put before Parliament so that it can be debated properly," she said. “Yet again we are seeing the actions of an illiberal government who are scared to debate their record or be open to scrutiny.

"First we had the gagging act, and now these gagging clauses - where will this end? They should be open to the legitimate views and ideas of civil society, who are the ones who have to deal with the failings of government policy, not ride roughshod over them. For the sake of a decent and transparent democracy I urge them to reconsider."

Sector bodies, including NCVO and Acevo, have also strongly voiced objections to the clause. 

Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of NCVO, said that the clause is “tantamount to making charities take a vow of silence”.

He said: “Charities provide vital insights and expertise which improve policy-making and often help save or better target tax payer’s money. Charities are already subject to charity law and guidance on campaigning that does not permit party-political campaigning.

 “The new rules attached to grant income would appear to prevent charities from suggesting improvements or efficiencies to civil servants or ministers, or even from raising concerns with MPs, for example about the treatment of vulnerable people.

"Indeed, several government departments have developed ‘strategic partner’ grant programmes specifically to enable them to access the expertise of charities to inform their policy development and delivery for these reasons.

 “This is tantamount to making charities take a vow of silence and goes against the spirit of open policy making that this government has hitherto championed. We call on Ministers to reconsider this draconian move that could have significant consequences for the charity sector’s relationship with government. I trust government will consult further on this.”

Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of Acevo, said he is “shocked and disappointed by the latest erosion of free speech and advocacy” and also urged the government to reconsider.

“Charities by their very nature are best placed to know what is needed by the people and causes they serve. To restrict the sector from drawing the Government’s attention to gaps or failures of service is not only draconian but self-defeating.

Kathleen O'Neill
9 Feb 2016

Surely the money given to charities is our money not the government's. I want governments to be held to account. I wish governments funded all the 1181support that is now being done by charities but while we have them I want them to hold governments to account.

Bob
12 Feb 2016
Response to [Kathleen O'Neill]

Your are quite correct, it's not their money - it's actually our money ("we the people") that we pay politicians and, in turn, civil servants to administer for us. It's called Government.

So, taking this to the logical ends you are quite right; they are telling us charities can't do what they want with money we have provided (and which we might well be happy for them to spend in this way) without checking with us that we agree with the ruling in the first place.

And we call this a democracy??!!

Bob
9 Feb 2016

Is anybody really surprised by this? Just another example of the current Govt fundamentally changing the fabric of our democracy and society.

Unless there is massive public uprising about this / any issue (leading to bad publicity / egg on their face), they seem to feel they have a mandate to do exactly what they want, whenever they want and damn the consequences.

Carl Allen
8 Feb 2016

One wonders if and what judicial review might be able to make of this?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Charities criticise civil society minister for talking 'total nonsense' about grant funding

27 May 2016

Sector bodies have criticised minister for civil society Rob Wilson for talking "total nonsense" about...

Vital work of charities damaged by fundraising, says Charity Commission chair

26 May 2016

The “vital work” of charities has been damaged by aggressive fundraisers at some charities which had...

Report: 'Lotteries outperform door-to-door and face-to-face on attrition'

25 May 2016

Direct debit lotteries are performing “much better in terms of attrition” than door to door and private...

Oxfam director attacks Acevo and NCVO for 'toothless' response to public criticism of charities

27 May 2016

Bodies like Acevo and NCVO have failed to provide proper leadership and lacked a concerted response in...

Cabinet Office advertises for new Charity Commission board members

27 May 2016

The Cabinet Office has advertised for three new board members for the Charity Commission and reappointed...

Vital work of charities damaged by fundraising, says Charity Commission chair

26 May 2016

The “vital work” of charities has been damaged by aggressive fundraisers at some charities which had...

Facebook looking to make ‘donate’ button available to UK charities this year

23 May 2016

Facebook is looking to roll-out its ‘donate’ button feature to all charity pages at some point this...

Blue Cross, Mary's Meals and Barbican start to fundraise with contactless technology

20 May 2016

The Blue Cross, Mary’s Meals and the Barbican are the latest charities to trial the use of contactless...

Charities need to address digital skills gap or they will lose beneficiaries

6 May 2016

Charities must improve their digital offering or lose beneficiaries, the chief executive of Parkinson’s...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance