Share

Thomas to request National Audit Office investigation into Big Society Network funding

Gareth Thomas MP, shadow minister for civil society
News

Thomas to request National Audit Office investigation into Big Society Network funding

Finance | Tania Mason | 1 Jul 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas MP plans to ask the National Audit Office to investigate the public funding given to Big Society Network and its charitable arm Society Network Foundation.

He may also request that the Public Accounts Committee look into the grants.

Thomas has accused the government of wasting public money on “Big Society vanity projects” after a civilsociety.co.uk investigation revealed that the Cabinet Office and other statutory funders had given around £1.2m to the two organisations since they launched just after the last election. None of this funding has appeared in any published accounts.
 
Thomas has also queried why the Big Lottery Fund has awarded over £1.8m to them over the same period, without making them compete for the money against other charities.

A number of trustees have close links to the Conservative Party and Thomas has suggested that this may have helped them to secure the funding. The Cabinet Office has already admitted that it expanded the eligibility criteria for the Social Action Fund, without broadcasting it publicly, so that Society Network Foundation could qualify.

The Cabinet Office awarded the charity £300,000 but two months after paying over the second tranche, of £98,000, it decided to scrap its support for the project and withheld the final £100,000. The project never launched.

Thomas has said Big Society Network’s track record is one of “failure” and he cannot see on what basis the Big Lottery Fund and government funders keep giving it money.

To that end, he is planning to write to the National Audit Office and possibly the Public Accounts Committee to ask them to investigate.

Last week, the chairman of BSN and SNF issued a comprehensive statement to civilsociety.co.uk defending the work of the two organisations and rejecting the allegations of unfairness and favouritism. You can read the statement here.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

FRSB finds that both the RSPCA and Battersea Dogs and Cats Home breached code in work with FIL

28 Jul 2016

The Fundraising Standards Board has found that the RSPCA and Battersea Dogs and Cats Home breached a number...

Deadline for completion of proposed PFRA and IoF merger delayed

27 Jul 2016

The Public Fundraising Association has delayed the deadline for the completion of its proposed merger...

Last of the Fundraising Initiatives Group agencies files for liquidation

27 Jul 2016

Premier Contact, the last of the Fundraising Initiatives Group agencies that was still operating, has...

Charitable funds used to buy night vision equipment for convicted terrorist

28 Jul 2016

The Charity Commission has removed a convicted terrorist as a trustee and transferred money he raised...

Terrence Higgins Trust loses tribunal case against former chief executive

28 Jul 2016

Sexual health charity, the Terrence Higgins Trust has lost a tribunal against its former chief executive,...

RNIB announces acting chief executive appointment to replace Lesley-Anne Alexander

27 Jul 2016

The Royal National Institute of Blind People has appointed Sally Harvey as acting chief executive officer...

Blockchain technology could ‘revolutionise’ charity regulation, says report

21 Jul 2016

Blockchain technology could eventually be used to carry out many of the functions of a traditional regulator,...

Macmillan, Cancer Research UK and Brooke use Pokemon Go to encourage fundraising

14 Jul 2016

Macmillan Cancer Support, Cancer Research UK and Brooke are among the charities to encourage fundraising...

Stop looking for a 'big bang' moment for digital transformation

4 Jul 2016

Charities should stop looking for a “big bang” moment in digital transformation and instead focus...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance