Thomas to request National Audit Office investigation into Big Society Network funding

Gareth Thomas MP, shadow minister for civil society

Thomas to request National Audit Office investigation into Big Society Network funding

Finance | Tania Mason | 1 Jul 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas MP plans to ask the National Audit Office to investigate the public funding given to Big Society Network and its charitable arm Society Network Foundation.

He may also request that the Public Accounts Committee look into the grants.

Thomas has accused the government of wasting public money on “Big Society vanity projects” after a investigation revealed that the Cabinet Office and other statutory funders had given around £1.2m to the two organisations since they launched just after the last election. None of this funding has appeared in any published accounts.
Thomas has also queried why the Big Lottery Fund has awarded over £1.8m to them over the same period, without making them compete for the money against other charities.

A number of trustees have close links to the Conservative Party and Thomas has suggested that this may have helped them to secure the funding. The Cabinet Office has already admitted that it expanded the eligibility criteria for the Social Action Fund, without broadcasting it publicly, so that Society Network Foundation could qualify.

The Cabinet Office awarded the charity £300,000 but two months after paying over the second tranche, of £98,000, it decided to scrap its support for the project and withheld the final £100,000. The project never launched.

Thomas has said Big Society Network’s track record is one of “failure” and he cannot see on what basis the Big Lottery Fund and government funders keep giving it money.

To that end, he is planning to write to the National Audit Office and possibly the Public Accounts Committee to ask them to investigate.

Last week, the chairman of BSN and SNF issued a comprehensive statement to defending the work of the two organisations and rejecting the allegations of unfairness and favouritism. You can read the statement here.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Pell & Bales goes into liquidation with the loss of more than 100 jobs

24 Aug 2016

Telephone fundraising agency Pell & Bales has been placed into liquidation by its creditors, less...

Fundraising Preference Service model published for consultation

24 Aug 2016

The Fundraising Regulator has published for consultation its plans for the Fundraising Preference Service,...

Fundraising Regulator changes levy system to make larger charities pay more

24 Aug 2016

The Fundraising Regulator has today published the final arrangements of its registration and levy system,...

Charity Commission should ‘avoid the temptation to look tough’ when it starts disqualifying trustees

24 Aug 2016

Other infrastructure bodies have joined NCVO in raising concerns about how the Charity Commission might...

New Commission powers ‘threaten the independence of charities’, NCVO warns

23 Aug 2016

Some of the Charity Commission’s new powers “threaten the independence of charities”, NCVO has said...

Shaw Trust criticises Ofsted following ‘inadequate’ grading

23 Aug 2016

The Shaw Trust has criticised Ofsted following an investigation published earlier this month which described...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

New versions of free online impact measurement tools launched for charities

17 Aug 2016

The Inspiring Impact programme, a free digital impact measurement service managed by New Philanthropy...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button