Share

Charity fraud and tax-avoidance is an ‘industry’, says HMRC

Charity fraud and tax-avoidance is an ‘industry’, says HMRC
News

Charity fraud and tax-avoidance is an ‘industry’, says HMRC2

Finance | Jonathan Last | 26 Apr 2013

HMRC’s policy adviser on charities has emphasised the scale of the charity fraud and tax-avoidance problem – by describing it as an industry of its own.

Cathy Wilson took to the podium at this week’s Charity Tax Group conference, where she reassured the audience of charity finance professionals about HMRC’s prevention methods and outlined how seriously it takes the issue.

She even opened her presentation by expressing her surprise that the session had been entitled ‘alleged’ tax avoidance and fraud.

“I chuckled a little when I saw the agenda item,” she said. “Unfortunately, [these issues] are a genuine reality for HMRC. Just because you’re paranoid it doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you – and the tax-avoidance and fraud industry is out to get charity tax reliefs."

Wilson stated that HMRC administers around £3bn of tax reliefs for charities and donors each year, with about £1bn of that paid out, mostly as gift aid. “So it’s not surprising that unscrupulous people want a share of it, they see it as ‘free money’ and want to get hold of it, to see if they can reduce their tax bills by using these charity and donor reliefs,” she admitted.

Keeping the front door secure

Wilson expressed HMRC’s job as “to protect the Exchequer as well as to ensure we are getting the money to the people who actually are entitled to the money and reliefs”. She described it as a balancing act of making it “as easy as possible for the good guys and as bad as possible for the bad guys”.

“We check anyone who comes along and says 'I’m a charity and I want charitable tax reliefs’,” Wilson continued. “We check the people behind those organisations and have a front door that we police quite strongly – once you are through the front door, you have access to all the reliefs available.

“We’re not prepared to just take anyone in, and if someone moves on [from the charity] we’re not prepared to just take on the new person, we want to be introduced by the people we already trust to the new person. We’re not going to act on the instructions of anyone we don’t know.”

Three-pronged avoidance approach

Wilson went on to outline the three-stage charity-specific prevention method HMRC utilises, starting with the anti-avoidance rules, associated with lots of specific claims and reliefs such as shares.

She moved onto the fit and proper persons test, introduced in 2010 as a “controversial change, but an essential tool”. The tax reliefs were previously structured on a “claim now and we’ll check later” basis, and unscrupulous claimants would disappear before HMRC could find out they were fraudsters. It had no statutory basis for dismissing a claim at the start – but with the fit and proper persons test, it now does.

Wilson revealed that the fit and proper persons test has been used around 200 times to prevent fraud in the three years since it has been operating. “It has worked well, and no one has complained,” she said.

Finally she outlined the tainted charity donation rules. These were introduced in 2011 to replace the substantial donor rules which “worked quite well against avoidance, but were lots of horrible paperwork for charities”.

She explained: “The rules are meant to be a deterrent. They’re centred on a main purpose test – you will lose your tax relief if you have entered into certain arrangements associated with the donation which you wouldn’t have entered into if you didn’t expect to get a financial advantage. It helps to deter the avoidance industry – at least a bit. The industry is very creative, determined and ambitious.”

HMRC’s disclosure restrictions ‘create a vacuum’

Without naming names, instead using the pseudonym ‘Project 2010’, Wilson spoke of a recent gift aid avoidance scheme.

HMRC works extremely closely together with the Charity Commission,” she said. “I can tell you that we knew about a gift aid avoidance scheme that we published in March 2010 on our website. Our view at the time, and now, is that there is no gift.

“We haven’t had any repayment of tax to anyone who’s used that particular scheme, and we are planning to publish an update on it in a few weeks or months.”

From the audience, Charity Finance editor Andrew Hind ventured that the Cup Trust case throws up the problem that since HMRC can’t comment on individual taxpayers' circumstances, this constrains it from doing what the sector would like to see – statements that such schemes will never be allowed to work.

HMRC’s inability to comment has created a huge vacuum,” Hind said. “I wonder what your views are on that difficulty?”

Wilson admitted that it was a constraint, “one that we have to live with”.

“I can only say that ‘Project 2010’ is not something we would recognise as working.”  

Big four ‘use insider knowledge to dodge tax’

Illustrating that the problem is wider than the charitable sector alone, the Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) recently reported that the ‘big four’ accountancy firms Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers have been using their staff seconded to the Treasury to gather intelligence on how to facilitate tax avoidance.

Dennis Clapham
Recently Redundant
Socialist
28 Apr 2013

It is easy to spot the fraud, £176 Million in, £55,000 paid out. All the rest is smoke & mirrors. When the Tax office has so few staff at 4 to 5 figure salaries, and Tax consultants employ many thousands more people at 6 & 7* figure salaries, it is easy to see who is top dog.

What is more, the named BIG 4 insiders have staff members 'working' at HMRC to advise on policy, a 'gift horse' to HMRC say the BIG 4, a horse undoubtedly of Trojan decent.

The HMRC are not up to the Job, a chummy meeting enabled Vodaphone to avoid Billions in Tax. They are unable to a baseline to Tax the on-line businesses, or cope with Starbucks sleight of hand tactics to avoid paying tax on income made in the UK. Tax therefore should be made simple, you earn money, you get Taxed on what you earn, PAYE. If you want to donate to charity, donate out of your own earnings, and if you want to gain Kudos, Then publish the receipt.

I hope ALL those who use 'charity' to evade tax be named, shamed and put in Jail. All businesses found facilitating these scams be closed, all assets seized, (even if they are in the 'wifes' name), Then when they get out of prison, they might learn first hand how easy it is to live in a society they themselves have created.

Chris Zealley
Trustee
Several charities
28 Apr 2013

A simple remedy for the difficulty described above would be to deprive any transaction involving a charity from any kind of exemption.

This would include HMRC's normal privacy policy on a person's taxes, wherever a charity is one of the parties to that transaction.

The underlying problem is something else. That is, that tax avoidance is the default setting for a massive proportion of the people in the UK as elsewhere who have wealth or well-remunerated positions, not excluding a few politicians.

A specialist in this field would tell you 'all tax is voluntary'. And prove it.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Free eNews

Macmillan's voluntary income soars by £34.1m

31 Jul 2014

Macmillan Cancer Support raised £186.9m in 2013 – an increase of £34.1m on the previous year, according...

Half of hospices in England saw NHS funding cut or frozen this year

31 Jul 2014

Half of hospices in England have had their statutory funding from the NHS either cut or frozen this year,...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

Savile charity to challenge victim compensation scheme

31 Jul 2014

The Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust has been granted permission to appeal against the agreed system of compensation...

Cranfield Trust endorses stricter rules for new charities

31 Jul 2014

The Cranfield Trust has added its voice to the view that there are too many charities, recommending to...

Charity Commission to meet Society Network Foundation trustees this week

30 Jul 2014

The Charity Commission is meeting with the trustees of Society Network Foundation this week in an attempt...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

 Twitter button

@CSFinance