‘Mid-value’ legacy donors are the most generous, research finds

10 Oct 2025 News

By Charlize D/Adobe

People with “middle-sized” estates leave a larger share of their wealth to charities in their wills than richer legacy donors, according to new research.

Analysis by Legacy Futures and Smee & Ford of 145,000 bequests from all 46,000 estates processed that named a charity in England and Wales in 2024, found that estates worth £1-3m collectively left £1.3bn to the sector.

While £1-3m estates accounted for 27% of the total wealth analysed, they delivered a third of all charitable bequests.

By comparison, wealthier estates worth over £3m held 23% of all assets but contributed 12% of total charitable bequest value.

However, researchers suggested that some high-net-worth donors could be giving via foundations, trusts, or donor-advised funds, which fall outside Smee & Ford’s dataset.

Wealthier donors preferred cash gifts, the analysis found, while smaller estates favour residuary gifts - which tend to be more generous

It also found that high-value estates tended to donate towards education, culture, and heritage while less affluent estates more often supported animal charities, hospices, and medical research. 

Meanwhile, 6% of estates worth £100,000 included a charitable gift compared to 29% of those worth over £5m.

Ashley Rowthorn, chief executive of Legacy Futures, said: “The £1-3m sweet spot is where legacy fundraising delivers maximum impact and charities looking to grow income from gifts in wills can’t afford to overlook the power of the mid-value donor.”

Legacy Futures and Smee & Ford, which recently launched their Legacy Navigator online platform, expect gifts in wills to exceed £10bn annually by 2050.

They reported earlier this year that legacy income for charities in the UK increased to £4.5bn in 2024 as the clearing of a probate backlog was cleared.

For more news, interviews, opinion and analysis about charities and the voluntary sector, sign up to receive the free Civil Society daily news bulletin here.

More on