Editor’s note: This story has been amended following clarifications made by the RNLI’s press office, which have substantially changed the story published on 9 March.
The story originally said that ‘The RNLI had generated three times the normal return from its last summer appeal after sending it only to donors who had opted in to communications’. The RNLI have subsequently said that the ‘three times’ figure was in relation to response rates from donors approached, not the money raised.
RNLI have said that, in terms of income, the campaign generated £526,000, compared with £803,000 raised in 2015.
The RNLI is reviewing its original prediction that it would lose £36m over the next five years as a result of opt-in, after receiving far better responses than expected.
The charity announced last year that it would only communicate with supporters who have opted in to communications. But the charity's fundraising director Tim Willet said that more people than expected are choosing to opt in.
Willet said that, based on the strength of that initial response, the charity is now reviewing its original projection that it will lose £36m over the next five years, although a spokesman for the RNLI said the charity did not yet have a revised figure for its projected loss of income.
“We are delighted that currently we have over 450,000 people who have opted in, which is double our original, conservative, ambition of 225,000," Willet said. "We originally projected that we could lose £36m over the coming five years, and we are currently reviewing this figure now that we know who has opted in to understand the impact."
The charity said that the opt-in only campaign had achieved a response rate of 32.6 per cent, more than triple the 10.4 per cent response rate from the charity’s 2015 summer campaign. It also said that the average donation in 2016 was £8.39, almost triple the £2.94 average donation from the previous year’s appeal.
He also said the charity's net income ratio has improved since the move to opt in, as it is now “spending less by contacting fewer of those individuals who had a lower propensity to respond” previously.
Despite this, the appeal raised just £526,000, compared with over £800,000 in 2015.