Large charities will publicly speak out in support of payment-by-results contracts to be seen to be responding to the coalition government, but in private say that they don’t work, warns Clive Martin, director of umbrella body Clinks.
Martin, whose organisation represents charities working within the criminal justice system, was giving evidence to the Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary sector yesterday. He said that more charities competing for government contracts and feeling free to speak out about conditions within those contracts did not create a “happy mix”.
When asked by the panel to give concrete examples, Martin said some of his larger members publicly speak out in support of payment-by-results to look dynamic, forward-thinking and responsive to government:
“They don’t want to look old-fashioned or not fit-for-purpose,” he said. “But privately at least six large members say they don’t believe it is a good model but they don’t want to speak out about it.
“One even said we should stop bringing up the issue as we have been saying too much.”
Martin said that as an infrastructure body, Clinks felt freer to speak up, although it too felt under some pressure not to question policy.
These comments were echoed by fellow infrastructure body NCVO, who also gave evidence at the session yesterday.
Ben Kernighan, deputy chief executive of NCVO, said that while it has always acted independently, its role as a strategic partner with the Cabinet Office meant that it sometimes felt anxious about speaking out.
The Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector is chaired by Sir Roger Singleton, other members including Andrew Hind, editor of Charity Finance, Julia Unwin, chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Sir Nicholas Deakin.
The Baring Foundation has committed £99,000 over five years to the work, which will take an “annual snapshot” of the state of the sector’s independence, not just from government but from all stakeholders, such as corporate donors and pressures from local communities.
