Charity Finance SORP Survey 2021

Is the SORP fit for purpose? What would you like to see added to the next version of the SORP? Should it focus more on how a charity achieves charitable impact rather than on presenting financial information? Fill in our short questionnaire and you could win a £100 John Lewis voucher.

Using electronic signatures when remote working

01 Jul 2020 In-depth

Chris Priestley, partner, and Chloe Harris, associate, at Withers address the challenge of how charities can get documents validly executed during lockdown.

With so many of us working from home and practising social distancing, we set out below some of the common execution issues thrown up by the lockdown and ways in which these can be managed, in particular through the use of electronic signatures. We have considered these options in the context of charitable companies; however, charities with different legal structures will of course have different execution requirements. Charities should consider their own execution formalities and how the use of electronic signatures may be adopted to meet these.

Electronic signatures generally

It is now commonly accepted that electronic signatures are valid under English law. Ideally, an electronic signature would be applied to a document using an e-signing platform, such as DocuSign. These platforms commonly use authentication mechanisms to guard against fraud. If an e-signing platform is not available to you, then using a stylus to sign the document on a touch screen device or importing an image of your signature into the document are the next best options. The least robust means of signing electronically is by simply typing your name onto the document.

As long as the signatory intends to be bound by the electronic signature, then it will be valid so long as any other applicable formal requirements for the execution are met. Any use of electronic signatures should be discussed with the counterparties before signing to ensure all parties are in agreement.


Generally, the position in relation to contracts will not be problematic. A charitable company can enter into a contract through any duly authorised signatory (who is likely to be one of the trustees). It is important to make sure that the trustee signatory has been granted the authority to bind the charity, either through its articles of association or a board resolution.

A trustee may therefore, with the appropriate authorisation, simply sign the contract on behalf of the charity using an electronic signature. If an electronic signature is not available, the signatory may instead simply print off a copy of the contract and sign and date it by hand. If a counterparts clause has been included, it will not be necessary to circulate this hard copy to other signatories.


Deeds are used for particular types of transaction, such as transfers of land, and when there is any doubt about whether consideration, which might be thought of loosely as value, is being transferred from one party to another.

Generally, a charitable company can execute a deed through: two trustees; a trustee in the presence of a witness; or a trustee and a company secretary.

It is common for charitable companies to execute deeds by the trustees affixing the company’s common seal, while following any additional requirements set out in the articles, which generally require the signature of one or more trustees to accompany the seal. There is no reliable authority for the validity of affixing a company seal electronically.

In the circumstances, it is possible that two trustees, or trustee and secretary, executing the document electronically will be most practical, unless it is possible for one trustee to have the document witnessed.


When the execution of a document calls for a witness, that witness must be physically present at the signing of the document. As a result, witnesses cannot attest a signature via a video call or similar medium. However, witnesses can sign electronically as long as they are present to witness the signatory’s signing of the document.

It may be possible for witnesses to maintain social distancing practices while witnessing the signing of a document. For example, a witness could stand in an adjoining room with the signatory in his or her line of sight before signing the document with a different pen. As a last resort, signatories could rely on the fact that a witness does not actually need to sign at the same time as the signatory, but can do so later. It is important to keep a contemporaneous record of what happened in case of a later challenge.

While it is not strictly necessary for witnesses to be independent, as a matter of good practice it is better that they are so.


If electronic signing is not possible, it is not necessary for all parties to a deed or contract to sign the same physical document. If a counterparts clause is included, which simply states that the document can be executed in counterparts, then it is only necessary for each party to sign and date its own copy of the document.

Remember to keep your original counterpart in a safe place until we return to normal working practices.  

Charity Finance is packed with practical articles and analysis of the latest financial trends, as well as in-depth briefings on technical and legal changes, and benchmarking surveys to help busy finance teams get value for money. Find more information here and subscribe today!



More on