Charity tribunal rejects latest Catholic Care appeal over gay adoption 3

Governance | Tania Mason | 27 Apr 2011

The charity tribunal has rejected the latest appeal by Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds), the charity that wanted to be allowed to discriminate against gay couples that wish to adopt children.

Catholic Care wanted to be allowed to change its charitable objects so that it could bring itself within an exemption in the Equality Act 2010 and so be allowed to refuse to offer adoption services to same-sex couples.

The charity had already accepted that discrimination on the basis of religious belief alone would be unlawful under the Act, so it had confined its case to other arguments. It said the discrimination should be allowed because gay couples could adopt children through local authority adoption agencies or other charities and so would not be deprived of services by Catholic Care’s actions.

It also claimed that it could only operate its adoption service with the help of voluntary donations, and that its donors would stop supporting the charity if it had to provide adoption services to same-sex couples. This, the charity argued, would mean the adoption service would have to close if the discrimination was not permitted.

But the tribunal said the charity had not provided sufficient evidence that its donors would stop their support, and anyway, the discriminatory views of its supporters could not justify discrimination by the charity. As to the risk of closure, the tribunal said the charity had not yet fully explored all the alternatives and pointed out that other Catholic charities had found alternative means of operating since the law changed.

The tribunal also ruled that same-sex couples would suffer a significant detriment if they were not allowed to use the charity’s high-quality service, and the fact that they could avail themselves of other adoption services did not justify discrimination.

The tribunal’s ruling is the latest in a series of court judgments on the case, which began in November 2008 when the Charity Commission refused to let Catholic Care change its objects to exclude gay couples. The charity tribunal upheld this decision in June 2009 but nine months later the High Court ordered the Charity Commission to reconsider its initial decision. Last August the Commission announced it was standing by its original verdict and so the charity sent the case back to the charity tribunal again.

Catholic Care now has 28 days to decide whether to appeal this latest judgment to the Upper Tribunal. It is considering its next move. Arthur Roche, Bishop of Leeds, said: “Catholic Care is very disappointed with this ruling. The Trustees are considering their position and whether or not to appeal.

“It is unfortunate that those who will suffer as a consequence of this ruling will be the most vulnerable children for whom Catholic Care has provided an excellent service for many years. It is an important point of principle that the charity should be able to prepare potential adoptive parents, a service recognised for its excellence by the local authorities who are responsible for placing children, according to the tenets of the Catholic faith.”

Directory: The Charity Tribunal

Place a comment

P Haworth
3 May 2011

Interesting to consider that the powers that be seem to consider that a child brought up in a same sex relationship is normal and healthy for a child. Time will tell.

I can understand the argument by Catholic Care that donors may well refuse to donate when this may be contrary to their beliefs. But will others fill the void?

[Reply]

Dominic Tkaczyk
27 Apr 2011

So is it worse to allow gay couples to adopt children and then love and care for them, than for priests to abuse children?

[Reply]

Karen Drury
partner
fe3
27 Apr 2011

These "most vulnerable children" that they refer to are presumably NOT those who have been filing lawsuits over the years, then?

And this preparation of potential adoptive parents "according to the tenets of the Catholic faith" - does this not discriminate against other religions?

Breathtaking hypocrisy.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.