Funders must help charities better monitor impact, says NPC

Governance | Celina Ribeiro | 13 Apr 2011

Funders need to be more clear about what outcomes they want charities to produce and help those organisations in their ability to measure their impact, according to the findings of a report by New Philanthropy Capital.

The recommendations come in the Improving Prisoners Family Ties report released today based on a six-charity pilot of a shared measurement programme in the arena of developing better relationships between prisoners and their families. The pilot brought together the charities to look at how their different actions impacted on improved family relationships.

But, the report authors found, the charities came up against difficulties in accessing data and clarifying precisely what the government funders’ objectives were. The report found that in the area of criminal justice in particular, this confusion over desired outcomes means that charities can waste time collecting irrelevant data.

Government, and indeed private trusts and philanthropists, said the NPC, need to be mindful of charities limitations when requesting impact measurement information. The organisation went further and suggested that funders should pay charities for their high quality measurement, potentially funding a specialist staff member to do the job.

“The government is the biggest player in the criminal justice system, but it can do more to help charities improve prisoners’ family relationships,” the report reads.

Directory: New Philanthropy Capital

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.