Equinox staff set to strike over proposed pay cuts
23 May 2013
Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...
Sorry for interrupting, but there is something we need to tell you...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you wish to restrict or block web browser cookies which are set on your device then you can do this through your browser settings, the Help function within your browser will tell you how.
Irene Khan, who recently received heavy criticism for accepting a £533,103 payoff from Amnesty International's trading arm when she was asked to leave the organisation, has resigned from the board of the Charity Commission.
Former Amnesty International Ltd secretary-general Khan, her deputy Kate Gilmore and Amnesty came under fire from the international public when it was revealed that payoffs of £533,103 and £325,244 were paid respectively to the pair after Khan refused to leave at the end of her term in 2009. Amnesty published a full and frank explanation of events, conceding that paying off Khan was the "least-worst option".
But, as yet, Khan and Gilmore have made no public comment on the matter and some have questioned Khan's appointment to the board of the charity regulator which was effective from 1 January 2010. The Charity Commission commented upon the revelation that it had "no jurisdiction" over the pay-off to Khan and her deputy and that it was "a contractual matter between the non-charitable company AI Ltd and Irene Khan".
Announcing Khan's resignation from the Charity Commission this afternoon, Nick Hurd, minister for civil society, said: "Charities have a critical role to play in the Big Society and the Charity Commission, as the independent regulator has the important job of supervising the sector and preserving public confidence in charities.
“I have accepted Irene Khan’s resignation. I am grateful for Irene’s contribution to the Commission over the last year.”
Khan, however, dismissed the resignation as a practicality given that she no longer lives in the UK.
"It has been an honour and a privilege to serve on the board of the Charity Commission," said Khan. "I have greatly enjoyed the work but regrettably have decided to resign as my assignment overseas means that I am no longer resident in the UK and cannot give the Commission the time and priority it deserves."
Dame Suzi Leather, Charity Commission chair, added: "Irene's breadth of experience, and particularly her deep understanding of the issues affecting international charities and NGOs, has been of great value to the Charity Commission during her time on the board.
"She has however recently found it increasingly difficult to combine her responsibilities as a board member with her international commitments, and so has tendered her resignation. We wish her the very best for the future."
Khan is currently chancellor of Salford University and consulting editor of Bangladeshi newspaper The Daily Star.
It was also announced that John Wood, one of two legally qualified board members will continue for a second three-year term continuing to sit alongside Simon Jones, John Knight, Sharmila Nebhrajani, Theo Sowa and Simon Wethered on the Charity Commission board.
Dr. Barbara E. Harrell-Bond, OBE
Director
Fahamu Refugee Programme, Fahamu Trust
21 Mar 2011
Hello Irene, The Fahamu Refugee Programme urgently needs £50,000 annually to pay for a lawyer trained in refugee law, and a bit of technical assistance to ensure the sustainability of its information portal, its list serve, and its Refugee Legal Aid monthly eNewletter which has all been so far accomplished by volunteer labour and my shrinking savings. It is difficult to raise funds for it because it is global; most funders designate funds for regions or countries.
Edward Ingle
16 Mar 2011
Hooray!
I hope that she doesn't get another massive pay off now from the Charity Commission to add to her 1/2 million from Amnesty International.
Does her non-residency also mean that she will be resigning from her role as Chancellor of Salford University?
Stewart
15 Mar 2011
"She no longer lives in the UK". Yeah, probably because she's been able to move to Barbados with that payout! Don't people have any scruples these days? And they say politicians are scoundrels...
David Wolverson
15 Mar 2011
All very fine and polite words, but the scandal of a charity paying such huge sums was clearly wrong demonstrating a number of failures at the top of AI. It was very right that Ms Khan should leave the Charity Commission. Those regulating others need to have moral authority.
Helen
16 Mar 2011
Response to [David Wolverson]
I am not clear how Khan can fulfill her role as Chancellor of Salford University if she is living overseas - surely the same principles apply to this role too!
23 May 2013
Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...
23 May 2013
Big Society Network has finally filed its 2012 accounts with Companies House, nearly five months late,...
23 May 2013
There is a lack of financial capability on small charity trustee boards with many organisations leaving...
22 May 2013
Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...
22 May 2013
The trustees of the Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are not donating any funds to the National Association...
22 May 2013
Charities’ membership or non-membership of the Fundraising Standards Board could be included on the...
22 May 2013
Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...
20 May 2013
Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.
17 May 2013
The voluntary sector should create a “data manifesto” that identifies who holds data about the sector...

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
29 Oct 2013
27 Nov 2013
John
21 Mar 2011
Now how much did she take/get out of the till this time?
[Reply]