Volunteering England may slash staff by over half due to government funding cuts 2

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 24 Nov 2010

Volunteering England is considering cutting more than half of its staff numbers as it faces a potential 60 per cent cut in strategic partner funding.

It is currently consulting with staff and trade unions on proposals for restructuring which would reduce its staffing from 55 to 24 posts, including the ending of ten time-limited posts.

The charity, along with all Office for Civil Society strategic partners, will be hit with a drop in funding as the government has decided to cut the numbers of its strategic partners from 42 to 15 and make sure no strategic partner gets more than 25 per cent of its income from the Office for Civil Society.

The OCS is yet to announce its decision on which strategic partners to keep, but Civil Society understands that each partner has been in regular talks with the OCS.

Last year, Volunteering England received £1.5m in funding from the Cabinet Office, which represents 30 per cent of its income according to calculations by Charity Finance. Overall 82 per cent of its income is government funding.

Chief executive of Volunteering England Justin Davis Smith called the funding news "heartbreaking" for the organisation:

“It is extraordinary we have to plan on cutting back our organisation at a time when across our society there is more interest in volunteering than ever before. The coalition government’s Big Society is built upon volunteering, and Volunteering England has a crucial part to play in helping public and community services become more effective through involving volunteers.

“And it is heartbreaking we are planning to make redundant so many colleagues who bring extraordinary commitment to the cause of volunteering and have so much knowledge and experience to offer the volunteering movement and our whole society.

“We have to safeguard Volunteering England against a potential 60 per cent cut in strategic partner funding, and, together with the ending of time-limited projects, we have no alternative but to commence a consultation procedure on staff redundancies.

“The trustees and our staff team have been working for the past year on the strategic plan for 2011-2014. We have re-examined our range of work and identified the essential elements of our role as the national development agency for volunteering. The proposed structure will focus our resources on the twin tracks of strengthening knowledge to improve policy and practice and on engaging with our fast-growing membership and the volunteering movement.

“We are urging the Cabinet Office to discuss how reductions in the strategic partnership programme could be phased so organisations such as Volunteering England can diversify our sources of funding, continuing to strengthen our relationships with the corporate world and to increase our membership.

“The trustees would wish to place on record their thanks to the staff team at Volunteering England for their excellent work over the past years and their professionalism during this difficult time.”

Directory: Volunteering England
Who's Who: Justin Davis Smith

Place a comment

Karen Hood
Volunteer Coordinator
Leeds Advocacy
29 Nov 2010

Hi Karen though you would like to see this.

Paul

[Reply]

Carl Allen
24 Nov 2010

The term Big Society is misleading because Big Society itself has no population. Big Society consists of a few concepts that are already being implemented.

One of the primary Big Society concepts is known ... the permanent absence of the state in some activities and the consequent necessity for individuals and organisations to implement a do-it-yourself culture.

Bear in mind, it is the absence of the state that gives rise to a smaller state as versus a contraction of the state. Further the absence of the state will often mean the absence of state funding \(tax funds) which is not the same as the state outsourcing its activities.

In this context, it is a misunderstanding to accept assurances or statements that the government Big Society is built upon volunteering. It is not!

We now need to reflect upon the difference between a do-it-yourself culture and a volunteering culture.

And that where the state is absent, the private sector and the not-for-private-profit sector may have opportunities.

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.