Commission to speak to Acevo about trade union claims

Governance | Gareth Jones | 7 Jul 2010

The Charity Commission is to contact Acevo regarding comments on chief executive Stephen Bubb’s blog about it acting as a trade union.

Last year the Royal College of Nursing decided to relinquish its charitable status as its trade union function could not be classed as a charitable objective. This week, a spokeswoman for the Charity Commission said: “We are aware of the comment made by the chief executive of Acevo on his blog and will be seeking clarification.”

She added: “Charities have to be established for purposes that fall within the descriptions in the Charities Act (s.2(2)) and be for public benefit.

“This relates to the principles of public benefit, whether benefit to members is incidental and whether a charity’s membership structure exists primarily for the advantage of its members or whether people are able to generally benefit from the charity.”

In the blog post last week entitled ‘The CEO’s Trade Union’, Bubb (pictured) wrote: “One of the core functions of Acevo is to provide a trade union for chief executives.

“We have a range of support and advice services; importantly for the times of crisis and potential loss of job.

“We have an incredibly good one-to-one CEO in Crisis Service and then legal cover for the discussions that go on if resolutions to difficulties cannot be found.”

Asked to clarify Acevo’s trade union activities, deputy CEO Peter Kyle said: “We are a membership body that represents CEOs. Therefore we will always seek to promote the role of great leadership in sustaining a fully functioning and well governed third sector organisation.”

Directory: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) | Charity Commission
Who's Who: Sir Stephen Bubb

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.