Share

RNIB dismisses bias claim over drug produced by rival to donor

RNIB dismisses bias claim over drug produced by rival to donor
News

RNIB dismisses bias claim over drug produced by rival to donor

Governance | Celina Ribeiro | 16 Jun 2010

The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has dismissed allegations that its refusal to endorse a cheap drug found to prevent a type of blindness is related to the fact that it receives donations from the maker of a rival, more expensive drug.

RNIB says that its endorsement of the drug produced by pharmaceutical company Novartis, which is a donor to the charity, will continue until the cheaper alternative is determined to be safe by UK health authorities.  

Research by Moorfields Eye Hospital released last week shows that the cancer drug Avastin can help to prevent wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which can lead to blindness. Avastin is significantly cheaper than the current treatment Lucentis, produced by Novartis.

The RNIB was accused of conflicted interests, in a blog which followed the research. The writer, Jim Edwards, suggested that there was “a connection” between RNIB's status as a recipient of funds from Novartis and its support of the company’s products against cheaper rivals.

But the RNIB steadfastly denied any allegations of bias. In a statement, the charity said that its position on the drugs “is in absolutely no way linked to any funding the charity might receive from pharmaceutical companies”.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) has been asked to investigate the use of Avastin for sight loss, and RNIB said it will not change its position on the drug ahead of Nice’s research conclusions.  

The charity said it worked to develop strong ties with pharmaceutical companies in the field of eye disease, but that funding from such companies in the last financial year accounted for less than 0.35 per cent of RNIB's total income of £96m.

RNIB is very much aware of the importance of ensuring that our relationship with pharmaceutical companies stands up to close scrutiny. We will not embark on, or continue with, any sponsorship arrangement or collaborative venture which might damage our independence or impact on our ability to represent the interests of our beneficiaries in the best possible way,” the charity said.

“It is important that wherever possible, RNIB maintains positive relationships with pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in developing drugs and treatments for people with eye disease. These relationships enable us to promote the needs of current and future patients. We have relationships with a number of companies whilst maintaining our independence.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<