Share

Charity expenses story 'highlights risk to public trust'

Charity expenses story 'highlights risk to public trust'
News

Charity expenses story 'highlights risk to public trust' 1

Governance | Tania Mason | 12 Apr 2010

The story in last week’s national newspapers accusing directors of the charity E-Act of making extortionate expense claims proves that the expenses issue remains a threat to the sector’s reputation, according to IT consultant John Tate.

Tate, who kicked off the sector debate about expense claims last summer by inviting the sector umbrella bodies to publish their own expenses, said the story demonstrated that much more still needed to be done to promote openness and transparency in order to minimise the risks to public trust in the sector.

While he stopped short of saying that the Independent Expert Group on Expenses set up by NCVO and CFDG got it wrong by not demanding mandatory disclosure of expenses, Tate did say that “some of the umbrella bodies could be better at developing policy that supports greater transparency”.

“This story came as absolutely no surprise to me,” Tate, who is IT adviser to CFDG, said. “I am aware of a number of charities that have abused their expenses, but generally I found out when I was doing consultancy so client confidentiality means I can’t disclose who they are.

“While I recognise it is likely to be a small number of cases, when it does occur it is likely to be accompanied by other cultural problems, such as poor management of staff or bullying, or autocracy or secrecy.

“I would welcome more people in the sector starting to drive forward a whole cultural shift in the transparency agenda, lock stock and barrel, instead of resisting attempts to make the sector more open.”

According to reports in the Evening Standard and the Guardian, E-Act’s director-general Sir Bruce Liddington claimed £1,436 for two nights at a hotel for himself and another director attending a two-day conference in Birmingham in November.  They stayed in the Hyatt Regency hotel’s club deluxe king suites (pictured), ate breakfast in the hotel and availed themselves of the minibars.

Sir Bruce, a former schools commissioner for England, initially denied claiming back the money, but later a spokesman for the trust confirmed he had inadvertently submitted it as an expense and would repay it.

E-Act is a charitable trust that runs state-funded city academies.

The expenses information was exposed after Liberal Democrat MP Paul Holmes told a Commons committee hearing that E-Act directors “all get company credit cards and expense accounts…they use chauffeur-driven BMW and Merc limousines to go and visit the academies”.

E-Act said this was untrue, saying most directors and staff travel by rail or private car.

John Bangs, head of education at the National Union of Teachers, echoed John Tate’s call for greater transparency.
He said: “It may or may not be the case that some of the claims made by some people about Sir Bruce and his minions driving BMWs may or may not be over-exaggerated. But how would you know?”

Alan Martin
Chief executive
Yardley Great Trust
14 Apr 2010

How on earth does a highly competent individual "inadvertently" submit an expenses claim?

And why is it necessary to stay in such lavish accommodation? I have always thought that charities would have nothing to fear from publication of expenses but it would be yet another administrative burden.

Having read this story, I see now why it is necessary and must be enforced (By the way, I do not claim car allowance from my charity because it would be a relatively small amount and I think my remuneration is satisfactory. Am I in a small minority?)

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

emailalert

Tribunal upholds Commission's merger decision but orders changes

24 May 2012

The Charity Tribunal has upheld the Charity Commission’s decision to allow two independent schools in...

Tender is issued for £200m National Citizen Service contracts

24 May 2012

The Department for Education has issued an invitation to tender for delivery of the National Citizen Service...

Trustees 'should be free to seek total return investments without approval'

24 May 2012

The Charity Law Association has recommended trustees are given the legal freedom to invest on a total...

Philanthropy in higher education consultation looks at collaboration with wider charity sector

25 May 2012

The Higher Education Funding Council for England has hinted at the possibility of collaboration with the...

Esmée Fairbairn: applications to trusts and foundations remain stable

25 May 2012

The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation is surprised not to have been inundated with applications for funding...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Charities express concerns over cookie compliance

25 May 2012

From tomorrow the Information Commissioner’s Office will enforce the law requiring all websites to inform...

Charities in Twitter storm over balloon releases

24 May 2012

Charities are being urged to abandon balloon releases in a Twitter a campaign.

Missing People plans to use Twitter to find child runaways

24 May 2012

Missing People is hoping to track down missing children using Twitter.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<