Report: ‘The independence of the voluntary sector is under serious attack’

Report: ‘The independence of the voluntary sector is under serious attack’

Report: ‘The independence of the voluntary sector is under serious attack’

Governance | Kirsty Weakley | 14 Mar 2016

The charity sector faces fundamental challenges to its independence, largely from government, according to a report published today.

The report, Independence in Question, written by Caroline Slocock, director at think tank Civil Exchange, builds on the work of the Panel of the Independence of the Voluntary Sector, a five year programme set up to measure whether charities' independence was under threat.

Slocock said: “Independence in Question shows how the cumulative impact of challenges over that period – and the rise of even more recent threats – leaves an unhealthy imbalance between community, private sector and state power and the sector in a critical position.

“More than ever, the voluntary sector must develop a new and more self-confident vision which stresses the distinctive qualities of an independent sector, challenges the status quo and shows how, collectively, it can be even better at delivering its mission.”

Key findings

“Since the Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector produced its final report, An Independent Mission: the voluntary sector in 2015, a year ago, the challenges to independence that gave us such concern then have only increased.”

“In 2016, the independence of the voluntary sector is under serious attack. For some years threats to its independence have been growing steadily. The final report of the Panel on the Independence of the Voluntary Sector raised serious concerns about the challenges to sector independence. This report, which picks up where the Panel left off, concludes that the situation is now more dangerous still. Unless checked, it seems likely that the sector will face further, even more fundamental challenges to its independence in the years ahead.”

There has been “a major shift in voluntary sector funding from relatively flexible grants that enabled them to help shape public services to contracts that specified what they should deliver; and has created a competitive ‘race to the bottom’ on price."

“It is somewhat ironic that local opportunities to access and respond to the voice of an independent voluntary sector are likely to be seriously undermined by policy changes now being made right at the centre of government – changes themselves made without any prior consultation.

“Notable amongst these is the Cabinet Office’s decision to include a ‘no advocacy’ clause in grant agreements funded by the taxpayer right across the public sector. The clause stops grant funding of ‘activity intended to influence or attempt to influence Parliament, government or political parties, or attempting to influence the awarding or renewal of contracts and grants, or attempting to influence legislative or regulatory action.’ Unless exceptions are made, this measure will undermine many collaborative initiatives designed to deliver good government and better services.”

“The government is committed in the Compact to consult the voluntary sector but there was no prior consultation on either the Lobbying Act or the ‘no advocacy’ clauses. Experience of the DCLG clause suggests that organisations are unsure whether they are able to respond to government consultations if they are grant funded.”

“The climate has become increasingly negative toward charity campaigning amongst some newspapers and only a third of Conservative MPs now think is important for charities to highlight where government policies would negatively affect people, compared with 93 per cent of Labour MPs.9 Self-censorship by the voluntary sector remains a major, if unreported, issue though there are notable exceptions, for example on migration.”

“Umbrella organisations are also finding it hard to find the funds to maintain their independent action.”




[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Philanthropy can be 'disconnected, illegitimate and out of touch', warns JRF chief executive

29 Jun 2016

Julia Unwin, the outgoing chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, urged philanthropists to...

'Shocking' tribunal decision calls on Friends of the Earth to pay £1m tax bill

23 Jun 2016

Friends of the Earth's chief executive has condemned a tribunal decision instructing it to pay a tax bill...

Cancer Research UK invests in out-of-town superstores after drop in charity shop profits

22 Jun 2016

Cancer Research UK saw profits from its charity shops fall in the year to March 2016, and has responded...

Fundraising Regulator rejected by Scotland in favour of self-regulation

30 Jun 2016

The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations has rejected extending the remit of the Fundraising Regulator...

ICO received 260 complaints about charity fundraising nuisance calls in nine months

29 Jun 2016

In the nine months between August 2015 and March 2016, the Information Commissioner's Office received...

Charities will still have to adhere to EU data protection standards despite Brexit vote

28 Jun 2016

Charities in the UK will have to adhere to data protection standards that are the “equivalent” of...

Marie Curie appoints digital advisory board

21 Jun 2016

Marie Curie has appointed a digital advisory board to help it build on the successes of its digital transformation...

'Fake' charity app to help migrants at sea has been removed by Apple

21 Jun 2016

An app that claimed to support a charity rescuing refugees in the Mediterranean by enabling users to search...

Facebook looking to make ‘donate’ button available to UK charities this year

23 May 2016

Facebook is looking to roll-out its ‘donate’ button feature to all charity pages at some point this...

Join the discussion


Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<