Nesta was 'forced' to fund Big Society Network, says former trustee

Nesta was 'forced' to fund Big Society Network, says former trustee

Nesta was 'forced' to fund Big Society Network, says former trustee

Governance | Tania Mason | 22 Jul 2014

Former Nesta trustee Liam Black tweeted this morning that Nesta was “forced” to fund Big Society Network.

In the wake of the damning National Audit Office report published yesterday on the Cabinet Office and Big Lottery funding of Big Society Network and its charity arm, Society Network Foundation, Black tweeted this morning: “@Nesta_uk was also forced to provide £££ for Big Society Network. Scandalous waste of money.”

Black, a former chief executive of Jamie Oliver's restaurant social enterprise Fifteen, was a trustee of Nesta from January 2010 until April 2012.

Nesta confirmed to Civil Society News in May 2013, in response to a Freedom of Information request, that it gave statutory grants totalling £480,000 to Big Society Network in 2010 without holding a competitive pitch, to help the company set itself up and deliver various projects. At the time Nesta was a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). Nesta has since been spun off as an independent charity.

In its FoI response, Nesta confirmed that in December 2010 it awarded a grant of £400,000 to Big Society Network - £150,000 to part-finance the core costs of running the organisation in its early stages and the remaining £250,000 to support three projects subject to matched funding being raised and milestones being achieved.

These three projects were Nexters, Spring, and It’s our community.

There was no competitive pitch for the money. A Nesta spokeswoman said at the time: “While the vast majority of Nesta’s grants are made following open calls for proposals, we do have the ability to provide grants to projects that fit with our vision and advance our objects outside of open calls for proposals. That is what happened with the grants to the Big Society Network.”

Nesta also confirmed that it gave BSN £80,000 in August 2010 to support a project called Your Local Budget, which explored “innovative approaches to participatory budgeting”.

Nesta had not responded to an invitation to comment on Black’s tweet by the time of publication of this story, 1pm on Tuesday 22 July.

Pressure building for return of the money

Meanwhile, pressure is building for action to be taken to recoup some of the money given to Big Society Network in light of the NAO report.

Gareth Thomas MP, the former shadow minister for civil society, told Civil Society News this morning: “The Big Society Network was launched by David Cameron in Number 10, was stuffed full of his allies and had privileged access to Big Lottery and government funding. The result has been a three-year affair of grand ambitions that never came anywhere near being achieved, with all the while, the Big Lottery Fund looking on with a degree of benevolence few other charities could expect.

“The Big Lottery Fund cannot say they weren’t warned. Many in the charity sector raised concerns, as did I directly with Peter Ainsworth. I was assured there would be proper scrutiny of the Big Society Network’s ‘Britain’s Personal Best’ campaign but there quite clearly wasn’t.

“We need to know what recovery action the Big Lottery Fund are taking, how much of the £1.8m they hope to recoup, and how they intend to avoid a repeat of this debacle.”

Richard Caulfield, chief executive of Voluntary Sector North West, echoed the call for some money to be clawed back. He also said it was time for BIG to “come clean on their relationship with Big Society Network”.

“I think there’s an inner sanctum, a national set, that knows they can knock on the Lottery’s door and say ‘I’ve got an idea, can I have some money’ – while the rest of the world asks ‘what programmes have you got?’ and bends over backwards to meet their criteria.”

Caulfield said it was clear that funding was awarded to BSN on the back of “central pressure”.

He added: “I think there are some individuals who should be banned from ever receiving any Lottery or public funding again. And I think some heads should roll in Cabinet Office as to who is responsible for forcing public spending in that way, when you look at the amount of programmes they launch and don’t stick to the rules they set.

“I think this is a legacy of Nick Hurd – he was so likeable to those that played with him that they failed to criticise or challenge him. I have a different view on his legacy to what my national colleagues do. I think he provided an air of respectability to what was actually a fairly shoddy operation.”

However Toby Blume, sector commentator and consultant, said it was “unrealistic” to expect any money to be recovered: “I don’t think they have any money, I think they’ve spent it all.” He suggested that the next action to be taken should be for the Public Accounts Committee to look into the issue.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

HMRC assures charities of ‘soft landing’ approach in Common Reporting Standard guidance

26 Aug 2016

HMRC has published new Common Reporting Standard guidance, which assures charities that it will implement...

Access Foundation to invest endowment in social investment

24 Aug 2016

Access: the Foundation for Social Investment has announced it will put its endowment from the Cabinet...

Charity investigated after it did not know its own income

23 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into a charity that underestimated its own annual income...

Save the Children launches £1m fundraising appeal for search and rescue boat

26 Aug 2016

Save the Children UK has launched a £1m fundraising appeal to outfit and support a search and rescue...

Royal British Legion criticised by FRSB after fundraisers misled public

25 Aug 2016

The Royal British Legion and a face-to-face fundraising agency breached the Code of Fundraising Practice,...

Pell & Bales goes into liquidation with the loss of more than 100 jobs

24 Aug 2016

Telephone fundraising agency Pell & Bales has been placed into liquidation by its creditors, less...

Free HR system to launch for charities

25 Aug 2016

A free human resources system designed for charities will launch next month and is currently being trialled...

RSPCA ranked fourth in global charity social media brand index

19 Aug 2016

A new social media index has said that the RSPCA has the fourth best digital charity brand globally, with...

Charity Commission retracts story which indicated it would no longer publish all accounts

18 Aug 2016

The Charity Commission has published a news story announcing it will no longer display documents received...

Join the discussion


Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<