Share

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties
News

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties

Governance | Tania Mason | 3 Oct 2013

Cafod will not accept the royalties from its communications director Damian McBride’s controversial political memoir, according to the Catholic Herald.

The Catholic charity’s chief executive Chris Bain issued a statement to the Herald earlier this week which said: “After careful reflection, the trustees and senior management of Cafod have decided to decline the royalties from the book written by Damian McBride about his time working in politics.

“We have appreciated the feedback offered by members of the Catholic community and wish to express once again our gratitude for all the generous support given to Cafod’s work.”

Cafod had come under pressure to refuse the royalties by another Catholic publication, The Tablet.  Its editor, Catherine Pepinster, tweeted a message calling on the charity to “disassociate” itself from the royalties.

Initially, Cafod wholeheartedly supported McBride, with a spokeswoman stating: “It would go against all our Catholic values - including our belief in forgiveness and redemption - to judge him for the behaviour and character he demonstrated in the past rather than what we see for ourselves today.”

McBride’s explosive memoir about his time in in government, Power Trip, was published last week and serialised in the Daily Mail a week earlier. His admissions about the way he attempted to smear opponents of his boss, Gordon Brown, led to calls for him to lose his civil service pension and be interviewed by police.

McBride himself also gave a statement to the Catholic Herald about the royalties, which said: “As I wrote in the Catholic Herald last year, ‘Cafod sees itself as nothing more than the sum of its supporters, its core purpose the living expression of their faith.’

“Given the concerns raised by a number of those supporters about proceeds from my book being used to support the agency’s work, it is totally understandable that Cafod has rejected my proposed donation, and I can only apologise for the critical and unfair associations made between the book and Cafod’s work over the last fortnight.

“The fact that Cafod is both inspired and led by its supporters is one of the reasons I am so proud to work for the agency, and I will continue to do so to the best of my abilities in the years to come. It remains my intention to donate all my royalties from sales of the book to other good causes.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

BeatBullying lost out on major funding sources in 2013

30 Oct 2014

The BeatBullying Group lost out on major sources of funding in 2013, exacerbating its cashflow problems,...

St Mungo's staff plan new ten-day strike

30 Oct 2014

Staff at St Mungo’s are planning to strike again for ten days from next Wednesday in further protest...

Commercial auditor joins Charity Commission board

30 Oct 2014

The Charity Commission has appointed an experienced commercial auditor to replace former board member...

#GivingTuesday signs up 400 partners with just over a month until the big day

31 Oct 2014

Some 400 UK-based charity and commercial partners have now signed up to #GivingTuesday – a global campaign...

Over £6m raised in first day of DEC's Ebola Crisis Appeal

31 Oct 2014

More than £6m has been raised by the Disasters Emergency Committee’s (DEC) Ebola Crisis Appeal since...

Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy announces six PhD projects to research giving

31 Oct 2014

The ‘rituals’ of fundraising events and creating the optimal forms of engagement for digital giving...

BeatBullying's technology CIC has not filed accounts with Companies House

22 Oct 2014

A software community interest company set up by the BeatBullying Group in 2012 is almost a year late filing...

Blackbaud launches online giving platform for individual fundraisers

17 Oct 2014

Blackbaud has launched its online giving platform, everydayhero, for fundraisers in the UK in a bid to...

Don't dismiss social media 'slacktivists', fundraisers told at IFC

16 Oct 2014

Charities should embrace and love charity ‘slacktivists’ because social is a great ramp for new donors,...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<