Share

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties
News

Cafod bows to pressure to reject McBride book royalties

Governance | Tania Mason | 3 Oct 2013

Cafod will not accept the royalties from its communications director Damian McBride’s controversial political memoir, according to the Catholic Herald.

The Catholic charity’s chief executive Chris Bain issued a statement to the Herald earlier this week which said: “After careful reflection, the trustees and senior management of Cafod have decided to decline the royalties from the book written by Damian McBride about his time working in politics.

“We have appreciated the feedback offered by members of the Catholic community and wish to express once again our gratitude for all the generous support given to Cafod’s work.”

Cafod had come under pressure to refuse the royalties by another Catholic publication, The Tablet.  Its editor, Catherine Pepinster, tweeted a message calling on the charity to “disassociate” itself from the royalties.

Initially, Cafod wholeheartedly supported McBride, with a spokeswoman stating: “It would go against all our Catholic values - including our belief in forgiveness and redemption - to judge him for the behaviour and character he demonstrated in the past rather than what we see for ourselves today.”

McBride’s explosive memoir about his time in in government, Power Trip, was published last week and serialised in the Daily Mail a week earlier. His admissions about the way he attempted to smear opponents of his boss, Gordon Brown, led to calls for him to lose his civil service pension and be interviewed by police.

McBride himself also gave a statement to the Catholic Herald about the royalties, which said: “As I wrote in the Catholic Herald last year, ‘Cafod sees itself as nothing more than the sum of its supporters, its core purpose the living expression of their faith.’

“Given the concerns raised by a number of those supporters about proceeds from my book being used to support the agency’s work, it is totally understandable that Cafod has rejected my proposed donation, and I can only apologise for the critical and unfair associations made between the book and Cafod’s work over the last fortnight.

“The fact that Cafod is both inspired and led by its supporters is one of the reasons I am so proud to work for the agency, and I will continue to do so to the best of my abilities in the years to come. It remains my intention to donate all my royalties from sales of the book to other good causes.”

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Action for Children plans to boost investment in fundraising

23 Sep 2014

Action for Children is planning to boost its investment in fundraising in a bid to offset the vagaries...

Too many charities 'moan and whinge', says Scope CEO

23 Sep 2014

Most charities would prefer to “moan and whinge about how hard life is” rather than innovate to drive...

UK Community Foundations wants government to discourage new private trusts

23 Sep 2014

Umbrella body UK Community Foundations has recommended tougher restrictions on private trusts in order...

Action for Children plans to boost investment in fundraising

23 Sep 2014

Action for Children is planning to boost its investment in fundraising in a bid to offset the vagaries...

Too many charities 'moan and whinge', says Scope CEO

23 Sep 2014

Most charities would prefer to “moan and whinge about how hard life is” rather than innovate to drive...

Kids Company could close without more government funding

22 Sep 2014

The chief executive of the children’s charity Kids Company has said that it is at risk of closure unless...

JustGiving page for Manchester Dogs’ Home receives four donations a second

15 Sep 2014

JustGiving has said that donations going to an appeal for the Manchester Dogs’ Home following an arson...

Commission's new online charity search to launch soon after delay

15 Sep 2014

The Charity Commission’s searchable online register of charities is due to launch in beta this autumn,...

Charities warned that digital campaigns can be 'counterproductive'

9 Sep 2014

Charity digital campaigns can be counterproductive and will need to change to keep the attention of those...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<