Catholic Care loses Upper Tribunal challenge over gay adoption

Catholic Care loses Upper Tribunal challenge over gay adoption

Catholic Care loses Upper Tribunal challenge over gay adoption

Governance | Tania Mason | 5 Nov 2012

Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) has failed in its latest attempt to challenge the Charity Commission’s refusal to let it change its governing documents so that it can continue to prevent gay couples from using its adoption service.

The charity took its case to the Upper Tribunal in September, challenging the April 2011 judgment of the Charity Tribunal which upheld the Charity Commission’s decision. 

Upper Tribunal judge Mr Justice Sales issued his decision on Friday, finding that although the Charity Tribunal had made some errors in law, these were not serious enough to render its judgment wrong.

The case arose because new equality legislation introduced in 2007 meant that Catholic Care could only go on discriminating against same-sex couples if it amended its Memorandum of Association, and for that it needed to gain permission from the Charity Commission. The Commission refused to grant this permission.

The Upper Tribunal hearing was the ninth court case on the matter.  The first hearing was held in May 2009 when Catholic Care asked the Charity Tribunal to overturn the Charity Commission’s initial decision.  Each time it has failed to convince the court it has gone on to appeal to a higher court.

Charity claimed fundraising would be affected

The charity has consistently argued that if it cannot exclude gay couples from using its adoption service, its ability to fundraise under the auspices of the Roman Catholic Church will be severely impeded, to the extent that the adoption service will have to shut down. This will mean that fewer children will find adoptive families.

In his judgment, Mr Justice Sales said that the charity had failed to adequately prove this point.  He cited evidence given at the Charity Tribunal hearing by adoption expert Dr Julie Selwyn, who said that because of various issues with the fee arrangements between local authorities and voluntary sector adoption agencies, councils are “wary” of using voluntary adoption agencies and so there is already a surplus of prospective adoptive parents on agencies’ books.

“So the presence or absence of the charity as an additional source of potential adoptive parents would be unlikely to result in more children in need of adoption in fact being adopted,” Justice Sales said.

The judge added that the Charity Commission had written to the 13 local authorities with which Catholic Care had worked, to ask about the case put forward by the charity. Only six replied, and none supported the charity’s contention that if the charity closed its adoption service then children would be left unadopted. The judge added:  “The responses and other research indicated that same-sex couples could themselves provide a good source of adopters of ‘hard to place’ children.”

Dislike of gay equality 'not a good enough reason to discriminate'

The judge went on: “The basic approach adopted by the First-Tier Tribunal (Charity) is correct. The mere fact that some people may feel upset if homosexuals are accorded equal treatment in some areas of life cannot, of itself, provide objective justification for discrimination on ground of sexual orientation.”

The only way that the law would allow such discrimination to take place is if some “real detriment to the general public interest” would arise if it was not permitted.  But Catholic Care had not demonstrated that such detriment would occur.

In all likelihood, if Catholic Care’s adoption service were closed, prospective adoptive parents would simply go to other adoption providers.

Justice Sales concluded: “The Tribunal was right to conclude that the charity had failed to show that there were sufficient weighty reasons to justify the discrimination it proposed to engage in.

“The fact that same-sex couples could seek to have access to adoption services offered elsewhere tended to reduce somewhat the immediate detrimental effect on them, but it did not remove the harm that would be caused to them through feeling that discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation was practised at some point in the adoption system nor would it remove the harm to the general social value of promotion of equality of treatment for heterosexuals and homosexuals – a value endorsed by Parliament in assessing and responding to the needs of society by legislating general rules to promote equality of treatment for homosexuals.”

Catholic Care will consider appeal

Catholic Care said it would consider whether to appeal the decision, adding: “Without the constitutional restriction for which it applied, Catholic Care will be forced to close its adoption service. The reason for this is that the service permitted by the current constitution is in conflict with the aims of the charity.

“It is Catholic Care's view that this will reduce the number of adoptive parents available and the number of children left waiting for adoptive parents will continue to increase.”

The Charity Commission welcomed the judgment and added: “The Commission has always recognised the sensitive nature of this issue and considered all the evidence and arguments carefully.”


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

You're not a charity if you’re funded by government, charity leader tells Tory Party Conference

6 Oct 2015

Organisations which receive most of their money from public funds should not be called charities, Frances...

Charity tax relief worth £1.7bn may be at risk following Osborne announcement, sector leaders say

6 Oct 2015

Sector leaders are urgently seeking clarification of the status of charitable business rate relief worth...

Save the Children International income jumps to £714m, making it UK's fourth largest charity

6 Oct 2015

Save the Children International has reported an income of £714m, making it one of the largest UK-based...

Partnership between Sky and World Wildlife Fund ends after raising over £9m

6 Oct 2015

A partnership between World Wildlife Fund and Sky has ended after raising over £9m since 2009, with the...

Richard Hawkes takes newly-created role at British Asian Trust

5 Oct 2015

Richard Hawkes, former chief executive of Scope, has landed a new job as chief executive of the British...

Rob Wilson accepts all of the Etherington Review proposals on fundraising regulation

5 Oct 2015

The Cabinet Office has announced that it has accepted all of the proposals made in the Etherington Review,...

MS Society warns web users of personal data breach after hacking scare

2 Oct 2015

The MS Society has written to approximately 25,000 of its web users to warn them their personal information...

Facebook apologise to charity after advert ban U-turn

1 Oct 2015

Social media giant Facebook has apologised to the Royal National Institute for the Blind after it lifted...

Pennies reaches 20 million micro-donation milestone

10 Sep 2015

Pennies, a micro-donation tool, has announced that it has now collected over 20 million donations through...

Join the discussion


Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<