Share

Investigation into governance at Wikimedia UK launched

Investigation into governance at Wikimedia UK launched
News

Investigation into governance at Wikimedia UK launched

Governance | Niki May Young | 2 Oct 2012

An independent "expert adviser" is to be appointed to undertake an investigation into the governance of Wikimedia UK after the recent resignation of its chairman and a further trustee.

The Wikimedia Foundation, the charity which governs Wikimedia chapters worldwide, has called for the investigation to "ensure that governance arrangements are commensurate with the standing of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia UK and the worldwide Wikimedia movement", the parties advised in a joint statement on 28 September.

The review will consider Wikimedia UK’s current governance arrangements, internal policies including the trustee Code of Conduct, the Nolan Committee Requirements, the Conflicts of Interest policy, the Representing Wikimedia UK policy and other relevant policies of Wikimedia UK, and best ethical practices.

In the statement, posted on the Wikimedia UK blog, the Foundation and Wikimedia UK refer to the resignation of trustee Roger Bamkin on 23 September over a conflict of interest where he was paid by local governments to lead two Wikipedia-related projects - Monmouthpedia and Gibraltarpedia. The investigation will specifically address Wikimedia UK's handling of this conflict of interest.

Although not mentioned within the statement, the review also follows the resignation of Wikimedia UK's chairman, Ashley Van Haeften, in July after he was banned from editing the English-language version of the site for, among other things posting an inappropriate link and using ad hominem attacks to try to discredit others. Van Haeften remains as trustee but was replaced as chair by Chris Keating, whose trustee term will run until the 2014 AGM. Bamkin is yet to be replaced, leaving six trustees responsible for the governance of Wikimedia UK.

Control over funding passed to Wikimedia Foundation - UK chapter will lose out on gift aid

While the investigation takes place Wikimedia UK will not be able to process payments from the annual Wikimedia fundraiser, which provides the main source of income for the charity - the Wikimedia Foundation will process payments for the UK instead.

This transfer of control to the international organisation means the charity will lose out on additional funds generated from gift aid, which it would have received since gaining charitable status in the UK last year.

Last year Wikimedia UK raised £1.05M (although under a fundraising agreements half of this was transferred to the Wikimedia Foundation), and the chapter projected a substantial increase to £1.4m this year including gift aid, estimating that 50 per cent of donors would participate in gift aid.

But the organisations advise that the transfer will demonstrate the high standards of the Wikimedia movement:

"Wikimedia UK has the benefit of legal and professional advice to assist in understanding and handling conflicts of interests. The goal of both organisations in carrying out this review, and Wikimedia UK’s in deciding to absent itself from the 2012 fundraising campaign as a payment processor, is to demonstrate that we mutually recognise the importance of handling conflicts well beyond simple requirements of the law.

"We understand our responsibilities to you: the members of Wikimedia UK and the Wikimedia movement, its donors, editors, and readers," the organisations advised. 

The review will not, however, make any changes to Wikipedia's policies and practices, as reviewing Wikipedia's editorial policies is left "to the community", the organisations said.

 

 

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

National Trust will sell green energy back to supplier

24 Apr 2014

The National Trust has launched a renewable energy trading company to sell electricity generated on its...

Payment by results holding back public service innovation, says NCVO

24 Apr 2014

The payment by results mechanism is in danger of making charities more risk-averse, according to a report...

Law Commission proposes checklist for trustees considering social investment

24 Apr 2014

The Law Commission has proposed changes to the law on how charities make social investments.

Teenager with incurable cancer raises £1.6m for Teenage Cancer Trust

24 Apr 2014

A teenager with terminal cancer has raised more than £1.6m for the Teenage Cancer Trust, including £1m...

FRSB calls for new rules on asking elderly and vulnerable for donations

24 Apr 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has recommended the Institute of Fundraising develops additional guidance...

ASA: “I wish I had breast cancer campaign” did not breach guidelines

23 Apr 2014

The Advertising Standards Agency has not upheld criticism over a series of controversial adverts by Pancreatic...

'Technology can offer charities more than just online donations'

10 Apr 2014

Charities are focusing too much on using digital tools for fundraising instead of how technology can be...

Amnesty calls for 'full and frank disclosure' on alleged US surveillance

9 Apr 2014

Amnesty International has warned that alleged mass surveillance by the American intelligence agency NSA...

Virgin Money Giving launches app following year of growth

1 Apr 2014

Virgin Money Giving has launched an app for users after reporting that 30 per cent of traffic to its platform...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<