Ex-benevolent fund CEO slams charity sector hostility to CEBF4

Governance | Vibeka Mair | 9 Aug 2012

Geoffrey Atkinson OBE, former chief executive of BEN, the benevolent fund for the automotive industry, has said he has been shocked by the open hostility expressed by some charity leaders to the Charity Employees' Benevolent Fund, the sector’s sole support charity for voluntary sector employees.

The Charity Employees' Benevolent Fund (CEBF) faces closure in September as a result of lack of support from the charity sector.

Atkinson, in a letter to the CEBF seen by civilsociety.co.uk, warmly thanks the organisation for its work "despite the apathy it has encountered".

"I was sometimes really shocked by the open hostility expressed by some charity leaders that I met," he says.

"Perhaps the unique part of the charity sector is that there seems to be none of the fraternity between them that exists within other employment sectors."

He continues: “It saddens me deeply that, thanks to the lack of understanding, fraternity and sympathy shown towards their staff by so many charity leaders, members of the massive voluntary workforce will still be denied the warmth and skilled personal care that I have witnessed being offered by so many of Britain's benevolent funds.”

Atkinson was chief executive at the Motor and Allied Trades benevolent fund, known as BEN. He is now retired but retains close ties to the charity sector.

CEBF, which launched in 2009, has helped around 260 charity employees and their families. However, it has struggled to build support from the charity sector.

CEBF’s charity supporters include the NSPCC, New Philanthropy Capital, NCVO and Victim Support, which have pledged £1 or £3 per employee to the charity.

Directory: Charity Employees Benevolent Fund | National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) | New Philanthropy Capital | Victim Support

Place a comment

Paul Edwards
Community Development Worker
N/A
12 Aug 2012

This is such a strange attitude from a sector that works so much as the advocate and support for the voiceless and downtrodden. This seems to indicate a basic flaw in philosophy and understanding in the sector as a whole, saving the few organisations that stepped up to the mark.

[Reply]

Carl Allen
9 Aug 2012

Shocking it is.

Unexpected?

[Reply]

Fiona Fountain
9 Aug 2012

I find it sad that umbrella bodes like ACEVO, Institute of Fundraising, CFDG etc did not encourage their individual members to support such a fund. Most professional bodies have similar funds that their members are encouraged to support.

[Reply]

Donald YULE
Treasurer
DHF
9 Aug 2012

I heartily second Mr Atkison's comments. This is a disgraceful state of affairs and shame on my former colleagues

[Reply]

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.