Share

Wikimedia UK board supports chairman banned from editing Wikipedia

Wikimedia UK board supports chairman banned from editing Wikipedia
News

Wikimedia UK board supports chairman banned from editing Wikipedia3

Governance | Niki May Young | 31 Jul 2012

The board of Wikimedia UK has voiced support for its chairman despite him being banned from editing the English language version of the site for at least 6-months after adding inappropriate material, including pornographic links, and using his position to discredit others.

Ashley Van Haeften, whose username is 'Fae' was elected by Wikimedia UK, the Wikimedia chapter covering the UK, as a trustee in April 2011 and unanimously elected by the board as chairman in May this year. He was sanctioned by the Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) of the English Wikipedia on 8 July after being accused of deceiving the community, posting inappropriate material and launching personal attacks to discredit other users. Other accusations, such as the infringement of copyright, were opposed by the Committee, which can impose binding restrictions on users.

“For numerous violations of Wikipedia's norms and policies, Fæ is indefinitely banned from the English Language Wikipedia. He may request reconsideration of the ban six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter,” the Committee said, also imposing a single-account limit and a “personal attack parole” which could see him removed from the site entirely if he is found to breach its community rules.

Van Haeften has received a long line of complaints relating to his behaviour as an editor on Wikipedia. The arbitration case was filed against him on 29 May by Matthew Bisanz from Washington DC.

“Fæ has rendered himself unquestionable and unaccountable regarding his conduct because he responds in an extremely rude manner that personally attacks those who question him,” he said, advising he brought the case to arbitration “as the community has been unable to resolve issues raised regarding Fæ's conduct and I believe his poor conduct and tendency towards disruption renders him unfit to hold adminstrative access”.

Subject to 'good faith concerns' by other users Van Haeften was found unanimously by the Committee of 12 arbitrators to have used ad hominem attacks to discredit those raising concerns as perpetrators of a personal attack on him - typically relating to his sexuality.

Concerns raised about Van Haeften include adding poor quality material to biographies of living people – considered to be one of the most serious violations. On one occasion he contested the removal of a link to an advert for a pornographic video, re-adding the content and extending the description.

In May founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales himself requested that Van Haeften not comment on his talk page: “Fae in particular is hereby formally invited to permanently stay off my talk page. Your false insinuations about other users, and badgering responses, are exactly what stand in the way of thoughtful progress on this and related issues,” he said.

Despite ArbComm's decision the board of Wikimedia, the charity arm of Wikipedia, has sounded its support, and defended its decision to elect him as chairman in the recent elections: “The Board is united in the view that this decision does not affect his role as a Trustee of the charity. His work at Wikimedia UK has always been enthusiastic and diligent. In particular, his knowledge of charity governance, and his ability to bring about consensus at WMUK's board meetings, have been particularly valuable.

“The Board points out that the editing issues were fully public before, and during, the recent elections to the board, and were openly and publicly discussed. Our membership placed their trust in him by electing him as a Trustee. He was then elected unanimously as Chair of the Board. He continues to have the full support of the Board.”

Wikimedia UK registered with the Charity Commission in November 2011.

 

Gregory Kohs
CEO
MyWikiBiz
1 Aug 2012

In November 2011, I commented here at CivilSociety: "Because the Wikimedia Foundation spends only 46 cents of every revenue dollar on the program services it is chartered to uphold, I cannot think of a worse avenue of charitable "expansion" than this Wikimedia UK puppet organization. More and more waste and overhead seems to be annual mantra at the Wikimedia Foundation, but it never sinks in among the gullible donating public."

Now this story about a Wikimedia (UK) chairman who can't even civilly control himself while collecting money from the unwitting public. How many more times must the rampant waste and out-of-control sense of entitlement be pointed out before people stop donating to any Wikimedia organization?

Lewis Cawte
31 Jul 2012

The opening paragraph of this article is slightly misleading and confusing. Wikimeida UK is a (independent) chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation which is an Americian based non-profit organisation. The opening paragraph makes it sound like Wikimedia UK are the only charity of Wikipedia and that they are the "big" one.

Ozone
3 Aug 2012
Response to [Lewis Cawte]

And...? Is the situation any less concerning if the subject's qualifications to lead "only" a small and independent UK charity are questioned, rather than a larger independent Americ(i)an one?

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

VSO's income increased by £11.6m in 2013/14

30 Jul 2014

Voluntary Services Overseas saw its income increase by 20 per cent to £68.7m in 2013/14, according to...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

Man admits stealing £300,000 from collections for Help for Heroes

29 Jul 2014

A man has admitted pocketing £300,000 donated by members of the public who believed it would go to Help...

Syria and Haiyan appeals boost Oxfam income by 6 per cent

30 Jul 2014

Oxfam’s total income rose by more than £21m to £389m in the year to March 2014, according to its annual...

PTA-UK: Big Society Network chief was confident of funding

28 Jul 2014

PTA-UK has revealed that it turned down an invitation from Big Society Network to be a partner in its...

FRSB rejects complaint against the RSPB

25 Jul 2014

The Fundraising Standards Board has thrown out a complaint that the RSPB’s Abernethy Forest appeal made...

Online donations forms are too long and cost charities donations, finds report

28 Jul 2014

One third of leading charity websites require potential donors to complete more than 20 actions before...

Greenpeace video removed from YouTube following copyright claim

14 Jul 2014

A campaign video by Greenpeace against Lego’s relationship with Shell has been subject to a copyright...

Oxfam advert removed after appearing before extremist videos

10 Jul 2014

Oxfam has removed one of its adverts from YouTube after it was shown on channels showing content from...

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<