Share

Plymouth Brethren takes charitable status case to tribunal

Plymouth Brethren takes charitable status case to tribunal
News

Plymouth Brethren takes charitable status case to tribunal 8

Governance | Jonathan Last | 26 Jul 2012

Two Exclusive Brethren groups are taking the Charity Commission to the Charity Tribunal after the regulator denied one group charitable status concluding that it did not advance religion for public benefit.

This is the first time the Charity Commission has refused charitable status to a religious group on the basis of the changes around public benefit introduced by the Charities Act 2006. Measures included in the Act relating to the public benefit test mean that the advancement of religion alone does not make an organisation eligible for charitable status; it must now prove that it advances religion for public benefit.

The Preston Down Trust is part of the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, a highly conservative, Evangelical Christian movement, and meets in Torquay, Paignton and Newton Abbey in Devon. Exclusive Brethren organisations typically limit contact with the outside world.

A Charity Commission spokeswoman said: "Our consideration of the public benefit requirement took into account the nature of Christian religion embraced by the Trust and the means through which this was promoted, including the public access to its services and the potential for its beneficial impact on the wider community.

“The central issue in the appeal will be whether the public benefit requirement is satisfied in relation the Exclusive Brethren organisations under the law as it now is.

"It is for the organisation to satisfy the Commission that it is a charity, not for the Commission to demonstrate it is not."

The spokeswoman added that the 'charitability' of the Trust will now be considered by the tribunal in line with the law relating to the advancement of religion for the public benefit following the Charities Act 2006. She said that the Commission welcomes this an opportunity for the law to be clarified in this area as it affects the Exclusive Brethren.

Wider implications for charities

Preston Down Trust’s appeal has been lodged alongside one by the trustees of the Horsforth Gospel Hall Trust, a Leeds-based Exclusive Brethren group that was granted charitable status in 1988, as the result of the appeal may have wider implications for groups registered as charities before the Charities Act blurred the distinction between religion and public benefit.

The Commission spokeswoman explained: “[Horsforth Gospel Hall Trust], along with a small number of Exclusive Brethren organisations, was registered  prior to the implementation of the Charities Act 2006 on the basis of the law as it was then understood. The 2006 Act removed the presumption of public benefit from certain classes of charity including religious charities.

“As a result, the Horsforth Gospel Hall Trust may be affected by the decision of the Tribunal in this case and that is why they have joined in the appeal against the Commission decision not to register the Preston Down Trust.”

The Commission is two months from the end of its current consultation on public benefit guidance, following its loss last year in the Upper Tribunal which confirmed that trustees and not the Commission decide how charities should meet the public benefit test.

MP: Decision 'runs counter to govt assurances'

Julian Brazier, MP for Canterbury and Whitstable, has written to the Charity Tribunal backing the two trusts’ appeal, arguing that the Plymouth Brethren has a recognised 'commitment to the public good'.

He wrote: “The Brethren Gospel Hall trusts have been recognised as charitable institutions by the Charity Commission and HMRC for over 50 years. I cannot therefore understand why they are now being stripped of charitable status and do not imagine that it was the intention of the previous government that the changes made by the Charities Act 2006 would impact on a well-known religious organisation in this way.

“The Brethren not only hold sessions of worship, which are open to the public, but also conduct hundreds of street preachings every week, as part of their commitment to the public good.”

Brazier added that he believes that Preston Down Trust is being used as a test case for all the other halls used by the Plymouth Brethren, and that if the appeal is not successful then it will be 'deeply threatening' to other churches and other religions.

“The Commission’s decision runs counter to the assurances given by both government ministers and the Commission itself, that established religions should not find themselves denied charitable status as a result of the provisions of the 2006 Act,” he said.

The Commission however advised clarified that, "The Commission has not revoked charitable status from the Preston Down Trust, a Brethren meeting hall. The organisation applied to be entered onto the register of charities and the application was refused on the basis that we were unable to conclude that the organisation is established for the advancement of religion for public benefit."

Brian
29 Nov 2012

It seems the Charity Commission are assuming the right to define religion now...the above document says...."they take in to consideration the nature of Christian religion embraced by the trust"...can I ask who gave them the right to define religion?. I am following this with interest since I came across these people and saw there passion and commitment to helping and supporting the community. Christianity must be a wonderful thing if this is at the heart of it...how someone can say they belonged to a Christian fellowship and, then turn around and batter the religion's subjects defies belief. It's personal that's all it is.

Christine Jackson
20 Nov 2012

I worked for the Brethren for almost 3 years, as a christian it was a brilliant enviroment to work in, no bad language etc.etc
Their doors are open, they run soup kitchens,they have open lunches at the halls. they are helpfull and generous to 'outsiders', they have their code of behavoir which makes a considerable change from todays yobbish and lazy attitude.They work hard and look after each other as well as the people they employ

Trustee
21 Dec 2012
Response to [Christine Jackson]

It sounds like you had good employers. However I'd suggest these were from the Open Brethren as the Exclusive Brethren do not open their halls to outsiders.

The Exclusive Brethren will not even share a cup of tea with outsiders. They consider all of us as 'worldlies' who they cannot 'fellowship' with. To ensure their purity they excommunicate their own members for minor issues and deny them contact with their families.

Rosemary Harding
follower of Jesus!
Christian
12 Nov 2012

Julian Brazier has been well hoodwinked. Apart from some open air preaching the Exclusive Brethren do absolutely nothing for the public good. Their halls have not been open to the public for at least 40 years. When my 92 year old mother was dying of cancer we wrote to tell my sister and she didn't even bother to reply.

John Handel
25 Nov 2012
Response to [Rosemary Harding]

Sorry Rosemary, but a follower of Jesus does not attack fellow Christians. We all have differences of opinion, but we should all fight in the battle against Satan, not against those of the faith. Surely Christian faith is the main public good? Leave them alone and get on preaching the Gospel.

Trustee
21 Dec 2012
Response to [john handel]

So why do the Exclusive Brethren keep taking other Christians to court then? How many thousands did they spend trying to prosecute the owner of peebs.net and close him down?

John Handel
5 Jan 2013
Response to [Trustee]

Trustee

Sorry I do not know what you are referring to as to money etc.
Anyone, Christian or otherwise, may have to take someone, Christian or otherwise, to court for whatever reason should so arise.That is what the legal system is there for.
If this is something that has been done by necessity then I do not know why you are entering into that yourself or why you should post it as relevent to this article. The Plymouth Brethren are taking this case to tribunal and rightly so considering their Christian beliefs, charitable status and benefit to the public as such.

John Handel
27 Dec 2012
Response to [Trustee]

Sorry Trustee I cannot answer your question specifically but can only assume that if something arises which needs settling and court is the only way, then that would be their matter.
I am not surprised by what you say as there are so many slanderous postings seen on many websites about the brethren which do not tie up with my own experience of them, then if I were them I would not hesitate to do the same to combat the persecution tactics of a small minority of opposition that seem to have gathered to attack them at this point.
I admire the way they are combatting this. Very noble.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Free eNews

Bubb: Commission performance must improve before charging fees

24 May 2013

Acevo chief executive Sir Stephen Bubb has said the Charity Commission will have to get better at regulating...

Charity Bank to deliver BIG's £10m social investment fund for small organisations

24 May 2013

The Big Lottery Fund is launching a £10m fund to help small charities and social enterprises attract...

Equinox staff set to strike over proposed pay cuts

23 May 2013

Unite members at Equinox Care have voted for two days of strike action over proposed pay cuts of up to...

Additionality concept still intact but practice is under review, says BIG

24 May 2013

The Big Lottery Fund has denied that its recent grants to Citizens Advice Bureaux and Home-start charities...

Help for Heroes 'overwhelmed' with donations following soldier's murder

24 May 2013

The brutal murder of soldier Lee Rigby this week has led to a sharp rise in donations to Help for Heroes...

Shadow minister wades in to Big Society Network funding controversy

22 May 2013

Shadow minister for civil society Gareth Thomas has tabled a series of Parliamentary questions to minister...

New Charity Commission website goes live

24 May 2013

The Charity Commission launched its new website today, and hopes that the improvements will make it easier...

Age UK and London Zoo on shortlist for £2m Google charity competition

22 May 2013

Google has shortlisted ten UK charities which stand the chance of winning £500,000 as part of its Global...

Your picks of the week

20 May 2013

Your CivilSociety rounds-up the most read stories from the previous week.

Join the discussion

Twitter
 
Training

Attending our one day courses is a highly effective way of ensuring new and existing trustees fully understand their role, responsibilities and liabilities.

>> Find out more <<